|
Post by kevmac1990 on Dec 17, 2014 13:37:38 GMT -4
Addressing the bottom 6 may be a good thing but they need help everywhere but maybe their top two lines. They could def use a hard hitting d-man or at least one that plays defense and they could also use an upgrade in goal which is starting to look less and less likely.
|
|
|
Post by JEagle on Dec 17, 2014 13:55:53 GMT -4
Was looking at the French board when I came across this "La demande de Ahern semble clair pour ce qui est de Cadorette et St-Cyr au Cap-Breton .. sa prend Dubois dans l'échange.."
Google Translation: "Demand for Ahern seems clear in terms of Cadorette and St-Cyr in Cape Breton .. its takes Dubois in the exchange .."
|
|
|
Post by statsman18 on Dec 17, 2014 15:14:50 GMT -4
Was looking at the French board when I came across this "La demande de Ahern semble clair pour ce qui est de Cadorette et St-Cyr au Cap-Breton .. sa prend Dubois dans l'échange.." Google Translation: "Demand for Ahern seems clear in terms of Cadorette and St-Cyr in Cape Breton .. its takes Dubois in the exchange .." If you get both for just him and keep your picks is do it.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 17, 2014 15:17:47 GMT -4
Was looking at the French board when I came across this "La demande de Ahern semble clair pour ce qui est de Cadorette et St-Cyr au Cap-Breton .. sa prend Dubois dans l'échange.." Google Translation: "Demand for Ahern seems clear in terms of Cadorette and St-Cyr in Cape Breton .. its takes Dubois in the exchange .." If you get both for just him and keep your picks is do it. No thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Y Ddraig Goch on Dec 17, 2014 15:19:46 GMT -4
Was looking at the French board when I came across this "La demande de Ahern semble clair pour ce qui est de Cadorette et St-Cyr au Cap-Breton .. sa prend Dubois dans l'échange.." Google Translation: "Demand for Ahern seems clear in terms of Cadorette and St-Cyr in Cape Breton .. its takes Dubois in the exchange .." If you get both for just him and keep your picks is do it. Would cost more than that I think. From reading that I get the impression Ahern is asking for Dubois but whether Dumont gives him up is something else. Cadorette being 19 will have I think a price tag similar to Bibeau last year. 1st + St Cyr maybe something like a 2nd and 3rd.
|
|
|
Post by eaglefan62 on Dec 17, 2014 15:45:45 GMT -4
Amt. I reading into the translation that we get Cadorette and St.Cyr for Dubois? Don't know if I like that deal. Would prefer to see pelletier,a pick and a prospect going the other way as opposed to Dubois. I like Pelletier but I think Dubois has a higher ceiling of potential. Wonder if Brassard would be going the other way to make room for St.Cyr?
|
|
|
Post by statsman18 on Dec 17, 2014 15:56:17 GMT -4
That's the thing. If that's the trade you do it. You still have 3 first rounders this year and you get a goalie who went to the finals the past 2 seasons for 2 playoffs yourself. You have to give to get if that's all they want I would do it. Yes Dubois is good already but it's not like he's the next Drouin or McKinnon. This fits your window better.
|
|
|
Post by JEagle on Dec 17, 2014 16:15:22 GMT -4
The way I understood it when I saw it was that if Ahern is going to trade Cadorette and St-Cyr to the Eagles he wants Dubois as part of the deal going to Baie Comeau.
So with that being said it might look like To Cape Breton: Cadorette St-Cyr
To Baie Comeau: Dubois Brassard 1st 2015 3rd 2015
In the end my idea of what the deal could be is probably not even close to what the real deal could be "If it even happens." but either way you look at it a lot of Eagles fans will not be happy to see Dubois go.
|
|
|
Post by gocapebreton on Dec 17, 2014 16:21:54 GMT -4
There's no way I would make that trade. Dubois has too much upside value. He'a a big, strong kid that's showing continuous improvement. He will be an impact player for the next two years, plus I believe he will have at least the trade value of a Charles Hudon at 19. So you get St. Cyr who at best is worth a 2nd or 3rd. So your basically putting the value in Cadorette. Yes he's good, but most all contending teams appear to have finalized their goaltending, and that plays into value. I would like more something along the lines of a 1st, 3rd, Pelletier and Brassard for those two.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 17, 2014 16:26:44 GMT -4
That's the thing. If that's the trade you do it. You still have 3 first rounders this year and you get a goalie who went to the finals the past 2 seasons for 2 playoffs yourself. You have to give to get if that's all they want I would do it. Yes Dubois is good already but it's not like he's the next Drouin or McKinnon. This fits your window better. We're not even in the playoffs with this team and 1 of the players is 20. If that's the trade, you don't do it if you're Cape Breton. I wouldn't move Dubois for either player straight up let alone Dubois plus more assets for both.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 17, 2014 16:28:35 GMT -4
There's no way I would make that trade. Dubois has too much upside value. He'a a big, strong kid that's showing continuous improvement. He will be an impact player for the next two years, plus I believe he will have at least the trade value of a Charles Hudon at 19. So you get St. Cyr who at best is worth a 2nd or 3rd. So your basically putting the value in Cadorette. Yes he's good, but most all contending teams appear to have finalized their goaltending, and that plays into value. I would like more something along the lines of a 1st, 3rd, Pelletier and Brassard for those two. Yes and the alternative is doing nothing now and getting Cadorette for a fraction of the cost in 6 months.
|
|
|
Post by jamesnorris on Dec 17, 2014 17:06:29 GMT -4
That's the thing. If that's the trade you do it. You still have 3 first rounders this year and you get a goalie who went to the finals the past 2 seasons for 2 playoffs yourself. You have to give to get if that's all they want I would do it. Yes Dubois is good already but it's not like he's the next Drouin or McKinnon. This fits your window better. This fits the window better? Dubois extends the window.
|
|
|
Post by mooseinfo on Dec 17, 2014 17:07:10 GMT -4
I dont see that as a good deal. I think you would be better off with a leadership guy and mentor type with D probably being need. You could probably get Hardie TYPE for a throw in and late 2nd. Then pick up a goalie for another pick and prospect thats not playing or needed.
BC goalie would be good for a team with a shot at the title. He had good D in front of him in BC. I see your team at least a year off from that type of trade and IF you have a 20yr goalie next year seems backward. 20yr goalies are cheaper at the draft.
|
|
|
Post by gocapebreton on Dec 17, 2014 17:16:18 GMT -4
I dont see that as a good deal. I think you would be better off with a leadership guy and mentor type with D probably being need. You could probably get Hardie TYPE for a throw in and late 2nd. Then pick up a goalie for another pick and prospect thats not playing or needed. BC goalie would be good for a team with a shot at the title. He had good D in front of him in BC. I see your team at least a year off from that type of trade and IF you have a 20yr goalie next year seems backward. 20yr goalies are cheaper at the draft. Agree fully. And yes, Cadorette had better d in BC.
|
|
|
Post by thetruth on Dec 17, 2014 17:46:39 GMT -4
We cannot trade Dubois he is 16 and getting better every game we will need him the next couple of years. I would never trade him at this point.
|
|