|
Post by L'il Boy on Mar 24, 2015 13:52:04 GMT -4
Yeah using the games played logic, Ehlers would have had more than both of them... but it doesn't work that way. if that were the case, Connor MacDavid (2.55) would have won hands down. In fact, Mitchell Marner (2.0) and Oliver Bjorkstrand (2.0) both had better PPG than Ehlers (1.98), Garland (1.92), and Strome (1.89).
|
|
|
Post by roarndog on Mar 24, 2015 18:37:19 GMT -4
It is unfortunate for the CHL that Garland must be recognized in any factors. He has an above average skillset but yet is a below average team player and an overall embarrassment to the Q.
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Mar 24, 2015 19:03:13 GMT -4
It is unfortunate for the CHL that Garland must be recognized in any factors. He has an above average skillset but yet is a below average team player and an overall embarrassment to the Q. Speaking of embarrassment....
|
|
|
Post by Arnold Slick on Mar 24, 2015 20:01:10 GMT -4
It is unfortunate for the CHL that Garland must be recognized in any factors. He has an above average skillset but yet is a below average team player and an overall embarrassment to the Q. Welcome to the boards Ross Johnston!
|
|