|
|
Post by Sébastien on Nov 11, 2008 16:21:35 GMT -4
hypothetically, 3 regulation ties keeps the streak alive Actually no. The current streak is "most away wins to start a season". A "regulation tie" isn't a win, so that streak would be over. However, there are the questions of "Most games (total and away) with at least one point" that can be discussed, but that seems to be a little more of a grey area sa far as record-keeping goes. |
|
|
|
Post by timsdoubledouble on Nov 11, 2008 16:32:42 GMT -4
hypothetically, 3 regulation ties keeps the streak alive Actually no. The current streak is "most away wins to start a season". A "regulation tie" isn't a win, so that streak would be over. However, there are the questions of "Most games (total and away) with at least one point" that can be discussed, but that seems to be a little more of a grey area sa far as record-keeping goes. i was referring to the second streak you mentioned |
|
|
|
Post by joepuck on Nov 11, 2008 23:39:52 GMT -4
hockey 1981 with stephens back in the lineup is lane in or out in Quebec and what do you think the lines will look like?
|
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Nov 12, 2008 9:11:26 GMT -4
This is what I think
If Lane plays, take Pettersson out
Lessard - Cameron - Eagles
Brown - Sill - Brannon
MacAusland - Stephens - Lahey/Famin
Pettersson - Bissonnette - Lahey/Famin
Out : Lane, Roski, Bell
|
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Nov 12, 2008 9:23:33 GMT -4
Lane will probably only play against Drummondville (Marcoux) but not against Quebec or Montreal as they have no tough guy in their lineup.
|
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Nov 12, 2008 9:29:56 GMT -4
Lane will probably only play against Drummondville (Marcoux) but not against Quebec or Montreal as they have no tough guy in their lineup. I Agree, or unless someone gets hurt or something to that extent. |
|
|
|
Post by Dman on Nov 12, 2008 12:12:35 GMT -4
Lane will probably only play against Drummondville (Marcoux) but not against Quebec or Montreal as they have no tough guy in their lineup. No tough guy in Quebec? What about Jonathan Roy?  |
|
|
|
Post by gongshow on Nov 12, 2008 13:29:46 GMT -4
Lane will probably only play against Drummondville (Marcoux) but not against Quebec or Montreal as they have no tough guy in their lineup. I would dress him against Montreal because they have a few guys that play dirty and like to throw borderline hits...Fillier and Grenache immediatly come to mind. Overall it shouldn't be too bad of a road trip considering they're flying up which will save them a 12 hour bus ride and also the fact that they've had only 2 games in the 14 days prior to the trip(against the worst team in the league) they should be well rested. I predict a 4-3 overtime win vs Quebec,a 4-1 win vs Montreal(they're still the fog devils ) and finally a 5-3 loss to Drum'ville with an empty netter  |
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Nov 12, 2008 13:38:42 GMT -4
Lane will probably only play against Drummondville (Marcoux) but not against Quebec or Montreal as they have no tough guy in their lineup. I would dress him against Montreal because they have a few guys that play dirty and like to throw borderline hits...Fillier and Grenache immediatly come to mind. Overall it shouldn't be too bad of a road trip considering they're flying up which will save them a 12 hour bus ride and also the fact that they've had only 2 games in the 14 days prior to the trip(against the worst team in the league) they should be well rested. I predict a 4-3 overtime win vs Quebec,a 4-1 win vs Montreal(they're still the fog devils ) and finally a 5-3 loss to Drum'ville with an empty netter Grenache is injured. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2008 14:30:07 GMT -4
I can't help but think that if Lavigne starts for Quebec, this will be somewhat of an advantage for Moncton. Majority of our players will know where to shooot having done so so many times last year in practice. Patrick Roy is a very smart man and with that, I see him starting Jonathan Roy against us.
|
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Nov 12, 2008 14:51:54 GMT -4
I can't help but think that if Lavigne starts for Quebec, this will be somewhat of an advantage for Moncton. Majority of our players will know where to shooot having done so so many times last year in practice. Patrick Roy is a very smart man and with that, I see him starting Jonathan Roy against us. Yeah but Lavigne will know where our players shoot too. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmy on Nov 12, 2008 15:11:04 GMT -4
I can't help but think that if Lavigne starts for Quebec, this will be somewhat of an advantage for Moncton. Majority of our players will know where to shooot having done so so many times last year in practice. Patrick Roy is a very smart man and with that, I see him starting Jonathan Roy against us. Yeah but Lavigne will know where our players shoot too. The guys shooting on Lavigne last year in practice were the same guys who for the most part couldn't score all year in game situations ... while this year we have one of the top offenses in the league ... maybe our shooters have improved! |
|
|
|
Post by Rocky Saganiuk on Nov 12, 2008 18:05:52 GMT -4
I can't help but think that if Lavigne starts for Quebec, this will be somewhat of an advantage for Moncton. Majority of our players will know where to shooot having done so so many times last year in practice. Patrick Roy is a very smart man and with that, I see him starting Jonathan Roy against us. The first start for goaltender against his former team seems to provide extra motivation more often than not. I would be starting Lavigne. |
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Nov 13, 2008 10:38:59 GMT -4
Don't expect Lane to play in any of the 3 games unless 2 Forwards get hurt or illness.
|
|
