|
Post by hal on Dec 29, 2014 21:59:12 GMT -4
So our last game I can see is 2015-03-21. So you're saying that his presence for the next 3 months is better than what we potentially can have for 4 years? Yeah..........Go Figure ?
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 29, 2014 21:59:33 GMT -4
No need for a pissing match. Im curious how it was misinterpreted now. How else should it have been taken? I said "The few months of Farrell influencing Dubois is more than what I'd expect CB to get in a trade" I'll repeat the quote in different words if it helps? I don't think the return on Farrell would be as valuable as having Farrell on the roster influencing a young player like Dubois. I didn't say he was irreplaceable. I didn't say Dubois would be getting robbed if Farrell was traded. I didn't say he would be more than a future CIS player. I didn't say a unanimous approval from the fan base was required. All I said was that I valued his presence more than what I believe the return would be. It was the influencing part i was inquiring about. I still am unsure qhat you see Farrell providing someone like Dubois. I think comparing presence to return all depends on what you ciew the return as. If someone offers a 1st i think you listen but agree on not much else being worth it.
|
|
|
Post by jamesnorris on Dec 29, 2014 22:03:04 GMT -4
So our last game I can see is 2015-03-21. So you're saying that his presence for the next 3 months is better than what we potentially can have for 4 years? What can you potentially have for 4 years? A drafted kid? He would be drafted after 4, 5, maybe 6 CB picks and there's just as much chance whoever is drafted becomes an irrelevant Jr. A player. I'll go out on a limb and say this scenario won't play out for you to prove the pick had more of an impact than Farrell
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2014 22:12:36 GMT -4
So our last game I can see is 2015-03-21. So you're saying that his presence for the next 3 months is better than what we potentially can have for 4 years? What can you potentially have for 4 years? A drafted kid? He would be drafted after 4, 5, maybe 6 CB picks and there's just as much chance whoever is drafted becomes an irrelevant Jr. A player. I'll go out on a limb and say this scenario won't play out for you to prove the pick had more of an impact than Farrell Absolutely and I agree. It could be a complete bust IF it ever happened, but it could also have a good impact for us. It's all up in the air.
|
|
|
Post by jamesnorris on Dec 29, 2014 22:22:15 GMT -4
It was the influencing part i was inquiring about. I still am unsure qhat you see Farrell providing someone like Dubois. but this is when it gets into a pissing match because you're fixating on the most irrelevant part of the post lol it's just one of the many benefits of keeping Farrell. If you can't see the difference between Dubois when he's playing with Farrell & Dubois when he's playing with Simard (for example) than I don't think there's anything I can say that will help you understand my point of view.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 29, 2014 22:32:11 GMT -4
It was the influencing part i was inquiring about. I still am unsure qhat you see Farrell providing someone like Dubois. but this is when it gets into a pissing match because you're fixating on the most irrelevant part of the post lol it's just one of the many benefits of keeping Farrell. If you can't see the difference between Dubois when he's playing with Farrell & Dubois when he's playing with Simard (for example) than I don't think there's anything I can say that will help you understand my point of view. Every player in the league will be better with Farrell on his line. No need to act like an asshat with a sarcastic comment like that. If that is how you are viewing things its no wonder you clash with so many posters. Your own response to that post would be how you are completely ignorong the point amd taking it out of context. The point was something you noted so i asked about why you thought that way. I was not fixated on anything irrelevant it was a very key part of your post. Your response only leads to more questions i see no point asking again as youd rather ignore your own point and turn it into a useless sarcastic pissing match. Typical.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 29, 2014 22:34:29 GMT -4
So our last game I can see is 2015-03-21. So you're saying that his presence for the next 3 months is better than what we potentially can have for 4 years? What can you potentially have for 4 years? A drafted kid? He would be drafted after 4, 5, maybe 6 CB picks and there's just as much chance whoever is drafted becomes an irrelevant Jr. A player. I'll go out on a limb and say this scenario won't play out for you to prove the pick had more of an impact than Farrell And ill take you out of context and say that players drafted around Farrells value will be worth way more then he will in 12 months. Whats the point.
|
|
|
Post by jamesnorris on Dec 29, 2014 22:57:17 GMT -4
Every player in the league will be better with Farrell on his line. No need to act like an asshat with a sarcastic comment like that. If that is how you are viewing things its no wonder you clash with so many posters. Your own response to that post would be how you are completely ignorong the point amd taking it out of context. The point was something you noted so i asked about why you thought that way. I was not fixated on anything irrelevant it was a very key part of your post. Your response only leads to more questions i see no point asking again as youd rather ignore your own point and turn it into a useless sarcastic pissing match. Typical. You don't understand how Farrell can influence Dubois but understand that playing with Farrell makes Dubois a better player? There was nothing sarcastic about my comment but I guess that's what I get for taking your bait lol you got the pissing match you were looking for! Just like last time, you misunderstood the point of my post, you posted a rant about stuff that was never said, and then tried to tell me the point of my own point of view. Funny thing is, based on your posts, you seem to agree with my actual point that the realistic return for Farrell isn't really worth entertaining, you just wanted to get in an argument tonight and blame it on someone else
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Dec 29, 2014 23:51:11 GMT -4
Every player in the league will be better with Farrell on his line. No need to act like an asshat with a sarcastic comment like that. If that is how you are viewing things its no wonder you clash with so many posters. Your own response to that post would be how you are completely ignorong the point amd taking it out of context. The point was something you noted so i asked about why you thought that way. I was not fixated on anything irrelevant it was a very key part of your post. Your response only leads to more questions i see no point asking again as youd rather ignore your own point and turn it into a useless sarcastic pissing match. Typical. There was nothing sarcastic about my comment but I guess that's what I get for taking your bait lol you got the pissing match you were looking for! If you can't see the difference between Dubois when he's playing with Farrell & Dubois when he's playing with Simard (for example) than I don't think there's anything I can say that will help you understand my point of view. No need to continue embarassing yourself. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by jamesnorris on Dec 29, 2014 23:58:09 GMT -4
No need to continue embarassing yourself. Thanks. That wasn't sarcastic, if you can't see the difference between Dubois when he's playing with Farrell & Dubois when he's playing with Simard (for example) than I don't think there's anything I can say that will help you understand my point of view.
|
|