|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 8:33:48 GMT -4
Post by Captain Obvious on Jul 13, 2017 8:33:48 GMT -4
It appears you have no clue about anything. You have been defending Trump on here for a year and now it comes out that all the allegations he said were false are being proven true. That e-mail chain that his idiot son released proves that his campaign tried and succeeded with meeting with Russian operatives to try and influence the election. Obviously with all the hacks and leaks they succeeded, now they should pay the price. The Trump family is no different than the Gambino or Capone crime family, they just have better lawyers. What about the Clinton campaign and the DNC getting info on Trump and his associates from the government of Ukraine in 2016? Oh wait, when it comes to Hillary and the DNC doing it , it is okay as it is just opposition research... but if Trump was doing it then it is treason. You're pulling stuff out your ass to try and defend a guy for selling out his own country to try and win an election, there is no justifying it. There is no evidence anybody from Ukriane hacked Trump or the republican party, not sure how any of that is relevant. You Trump wet dream goes on... |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 8:45:09 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 13, 2017 8:45:09 GMT -4
What about the Clinton campaign and the DNC getting info on Trump and his associates from the government of Ukraine in 2016? Oh wait, when it comes to Hillary and the DNC doing it , it is okay as it is just opposition research... but if Trump was doing it then it is treason. You're pulling stuff out your ass to try and defend a guy for selling out his own country to try and win an election, there is no justifying it. There is no evidence anybody from Ukriane hacked Trump or the republican party, not sure how any of that is relevant. You Trump wet dream goes on... |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 9:03:51 GMT -4
Post by Jack Bauer on Jul 13, 2017 9:03:51 GMT -4
It appears you have no clue about anything. You have been defending Trump on here for a year and now it comes out that all the allegations he said were false are being proven true. That e-mail chain that his idiot son released proves that his campaign tried and succeeded with meeting with Russian operatives to try and influence the election. Obviously with all the hacks and leaks they succeeded, now they should pay the price. The Trump family is no different than the Gambino or Capone crime family, they just have better lawyers. What about the Clinton campaign and the DNC getting info on Trump and his associates from the government of Ukraine in 2016? Oh wait, when it comes to Hillary and the DNC doing it , it is okay as it is just opposition research... but if Trump was doing it then it is treason. It is different in that when it's Russia involved vs anyone else on the planet then it's different because of Putin's politics and reputation and his countries history with the USA. If you don't understand that then go read up on history. |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 9:05:19 GMT -4
Post by Captain Obvious on Jul 13, 2017 9:05:19 GMT -4
You're pulling stuff out your ass to try and defend a guy for selling out his own country to try and win an election, there is no justifying it. There is no evidence anybody from Ukriane hacked Trump or the republican party, not sure how any of that is relevant. You Trump wet dream goes on... Nothing in that article is related to what the Trump campaign did in making a deal with the Russians to throw the election. Ukraine didn't want Trump there because of his relationship with Putin and the fact that he has no balls to put sanctions and stop him from taking over most of eastern Europe. If you let Putin loose, Ukraine will be part of Russia soon. |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 9:19:59 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 13, 2017 9:19:59 GMT -4
Funny how Trump wasn't President when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014... who was at that time? Oh yeah, it was Barack!
Which sanctions against Russia have removed since Trump became President?
|
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 9:29:54 GMT -4
Post by Captain Obvious on Jul 13, 2017 9:29:54 GMT -4
Funny how Trump wasn't President when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014... who was at that time? Oh yeah, it was Barack! Which sanctions against Russia have removed since Trump became President? ...and in case you have been in a coma since 2014, that's when they put in sanctions that Putin is desperately trying to reverse. Hence, the whole concept of hacking and wikileaks to try and get Trump in instead of Clinton. He knew Trump is spineless and would cut reverse the sanctions and let him take half of Europe. Duhhhh |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 10:09:07 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 13, 2017 10:09:07 GMT -4
Funny how Trump wasn't President when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014... who was at that time? Oh yeah, it was Barack! Which sanctions against Russia have removed since Trump became President? ...and in case you have been in a coma since 2014, that's when they put in sanctions that Putin is desperately trying to reverse. Hence, the whole concept of hacking and wikileaks to try and get Trump in instead of Clinton. He knew Trump is spineless and would cut reverse the sanctions and let him take half of Europe. Duhhhh So which sanctions against Russia have been removed? Can you answer that, please? BTW if Putin wanted Trump in instead of Clinton it has backfired in an economic sense seeing as how dependent Russia's economy is on oil/gas - the price of oil is hovering in the $40-$50 USD range and that is because of Trump energy policy. |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 10:12:54 GMT -4
Post by Captain Obvious on Jul 13, 2017 10:12:54 GMT -4
...and in case you have been in a coma since 2014, that's when they put in sanctions that Putin is desperately trying to reverse. Hence, the whole concept of hacking and wikileaks to try and get Trump in instead of Clinton. He knew Trump is spineless and would cut reverse the sanctions and let him take half of Europe. Duhhhh So which sanctions against Russia have been removed? Can you answer that, please? BTW if Putin wanted Trump in instead of Clinton it has backfired in an economic sense seeing as how dependent Russia's economy is on oil/gas - the price of oil is hovering in the $40-$50 USD range and that is because of Trump energy policy. I didn't say they were removed, Trump has said multiple times that he was considering it, then recently the Senate passed a bill making them much harder to remove, probably to try and stop the crazy old tweeter! The price of oil has been at 40-50 for a year, has nothing to do with Trump, it's in large part due to more access to shale gas which creates more supply. |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 10:54:28 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 13, 2017 10:54:28 GMT -4
So which sanctions against Russia have been removed? Can you answer that, please? BTW if Putin wanted Trump in instead of Clinton it has backfired in an economic sense seeing as how dependent Russia's economy is on oil/gas - the price of oil is hovering in the $40-$50 USD range and that is because of Trump energy policy. I didn't say they were removed, Trump has said multiple times that he was considering it, then recently the Senate passed a bill making them much harder to remove, probably to try and stop the crazy old tweeter! The price of oil has been at 40-50 for a year, has nothing to do with Trump, it's in large part due to more access to shale gas which creates more supply. And who was against fracking? Hillary Clinton. And who was for and is not curtailing fracking since he was elected? Trump!!! Economics 101 - Increase in supply of oil, assuming demand is the same, will drive down the price of oil. Fracking increases the supply so even with OPEC trying to keep oil prices higher by cutting or freezing their production the price of oil hasn't increased above $50.00 USD for too long. Trump was/is all into fracking so there ya go... |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 12:55:43 GMT -4
Post by Jack Bauer on Jul 13, 2017 12:55:43 GMT -4
I didn't say they were removed, Trump has said multiple times that he was considering it, then recently the Senate passed a bill making them much harder to remove, probably to try and stop the crazy old tweeter! The price of oil has been at 40-50 for a year, has nothing to do with Trump, it's in large part due to more access to shale gas which creates more supply. And who was against fracking? Hillary Clinton. And who was for and is not curtailing fracking since he was elected? Trump!!! Economics 101 - Increase in supply of oil, assuming demand is the same, will drive down the price of oil. Fracking increases the supply so even with OPEC trying to keep oil prices higher by cutting or freezing their production the price of oil hasn't increased above $50.00 USD for too long. Trump was/is all into fracking so there ya go... Imagine that. In US politics a democrat took a hard line on something so the GOP opposition took the complete opposite position on it. I'd love to hear what Donald's reasoning was for supporting it beyond key words like "red white blue jobs economy isis great again" |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 15:09:17 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 13, 2017 15:09:17 GMT -4
And who was against fracking? Hillary Clinton. And who was for and is not curtailing fracking since he was elected? Trump!!! Economics 101 - Increase in supply of oil, assuming demand is the same, will drive down the price of oil. Fracking increases the supply so even with OPEC trying to keep oil prices higher by cutting or freezing their production the price of oil hasn't increased above $50.00 USD for too long. Trump was/is all into fracking so there ya go... Imagine that. In US politics a democrat took a hard line on something so the GOP opposition took the complete opposite position on it. I'd love to hear what Donald's reasoning was for supporting it beyond key words like "red white blue jobs economy isis great again" I think it is pretty obvious- Politicians on the right side of the political spectrum in the U.S. want to see people working, paying taxes and having a strong economy not to mention it also leads to the U.S. not having to count on OPEC nations for their oil, the U.S. is already an exporter- LNG is going to Poland from the U.S. and could be also going to Europe which means they wouldn't have to be dependent upon Russia but you don't hear that much from the Trump hating media or the lemmings that follow it. |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 13, 2017 15:27:36 GMT -4
Post by Captain Obvious on Jul 13, 2017 15:27:36 GMT -4
Imagine that. In US politics a democrat took a hard line on something so the GOP opposition took the complete opposite position on it. I'd love to hear what Donald's reasoning was for supporting it beyond key words like "red white blue jobs economy isis great again" I think it is pretty obvious- Politicians on the right side of the political spectrum in the U.S. want to see people working, paying taxes and having a strong economy not to mention it also leads to the U.S. not having to count on OPEC nations for their oil, the U.S. is already an exporter- LNG is going to Poland from the U.S. and could be also going to Europe which means they wouldn't have to be dependent upon Russia but you don't hear that much from the Trump hating media or the lemmings that follow it. The problem is, people at the far right don't care if having some of those jobs destroys the environment and kills children. Since you love horror stories(you regularly quote the illegals killing people), go read up on fracking destroying drinking water in some villages/towns and making kids sick. I'm not suggesting it should be banned, but unlike Trump who just wants votes, I see it as common sense. Before you go all gung ho, have some regulations so every clown on the street can't start up a company and kill a bunch of people. It's not as bad as Trump's coal fanaticism, but it's an area where you can't work in extremes. |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 18, 2017 15:14:32 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 18, 2017 15:14:32 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 18, 2017 15:29:15 GMT -4
Post by Captain Obvious on Jul 18, 2017 15:29:15 GMT -4
Serious question, do you really read this crap? |
|
|
|
Trump
Jul 18, 2017 16:01:50 GMT -4
Post by moosefan1994 on Jul 18, 2017 16:01:50 GMT -4
Serious question, do you really read this crap? I read a lot of crap, NY Times, Wapo, National Post, G and M, Boston Globe, Daily Kos ( I think it still exists), Toronto Star, Brietbart etc- this came up as suggested article, I read it and posted it. |
|
