|
Post by Judas In My Mind on Feb 15, 2008 11:02:44 GMT -4
I could care less if we stay ranked in the top 10. I guess we don't disagree after all....I could care less about the top 10 either. It doesn't make us a better team because we are ranked ...or a worse team because we're not. But if we look at w% and only w% then the Dogs do deserve to be the 3rd ranked team from the Q..... it's like complaining about the weather, if thats your thing....have at it. Not saying anyone shouldn't say whats on their mind, but we are never all going to have the same opinion about anything....including the weather No no we CANNOT agree! (other than a mutual hatred for the Habs). 1. Who said winning % is the only determinent for the top 10?? 2. Who said being the 3rd ranked Q team means you must be top 10 CHL ranked?? 3. You said "we can't complain when we don't make the top 10, then moan when we do." which is a statement that tries to deny people the right to voice their opinion that maybe we do not belong in the top 10 at the moment. 4. We can only agree when you agree that I am correct. ;D
|
|
|
Post by habh8er on Feb 15, 2008 11:56:13 GMT -4
I was merely saying that we agree that the top 10 isn't worth the time it takes to say "CHL MOSAIK MASTERCARD TOP 10".....who cares??...Not Me!!
1. Nobody said that W% is the only variable in determining the top 10, but I did say "if"
2. Nobody said that the 3rd ranked Q team has to be in the top 10, but it seems like thats how it is. If you check the top teams from the WHL, and OHL, you would see that we have the record to support being ranked again this week.
3. Once again bitch and moan all you want....there are no rules that say you can't...what about that weather, thats a real groaner.
4 OK, you're correct.................................... not!!
I never said people didn't have the right to voice their opinion....thats what the board is for. I did say (in so many words) come on people give me a break we can't have it both ways....bitch when there is one outcome, and moan at the opposite.(My opinion)
If not the Sea Dogs then who do you think should have been in their place?
|
|