GDT: Sea Dogs at Fog Devils - January 6, 2008

[chillywack]

Just remember the game the Devils were up 5-1, and the Dogs eventually won it 6-5.

[canucklehead]

griffin said:

Just imagine what the score would be with Welcher and Kempe in the line up, point per game players, that should mean another 2 goals, haha this is fun.

St. John's shoulda won thursday night too, this was pretty close to a sweep.

What I find funny is when the Sea Dogs beat the Fog Devils that board was pissed when the Sea Dog fans came on there because they said we were coming to boast about beating the Fog Devils maybe now you'll see why some people chose to do just that.

[griffin]

bjindaho said:

griffin said:

Unsportsmanlike's should be called, I have no problem with a ref letting a few hooks and stuff go. If your going to go crying about a call that was a clear penalty (allard getting hauled down) then you should get an unsportsmanlike.

I was surprised to see the 2 mins, should have just gave Leduc a 10.

And this is where you jump off the deep end. You are suggesting that hooking and grabbing (real hockey-related penalties that take away from the skill and allow inferior teams to look better) should be allowed while unsportsmanlike (disagreeing with a penalty call after MANY no-calls) should be a hefty penalty. You are only saying this because you know the disparity in the skill levels of the two teams.

A little tug with the stick is part of the game, hooks should be called when they are blaitant, but some of the Q refs call the smallest of hooks and dont let anything go which ruins the flow of the game.

[major]

griffin said:

Just imagine what the score would be with Welcher and Kempe in the line up, point per game players, that should mean another 2 goals, haha this is fun.

St. John's shoulda won thursday night too, this was pretty close to a sweep.

Yeah well if Grant never took that stupid penalty late in the game last night we could have won that one too.

[canucklehead]

mrlittlewolf said:

not you cafuckleheadless

Well I am sitting on the #2 bus don't forget lol ;D

[bjindaho]

griffin said:

bjindaho said:

And this is where you jump off the deep end. You are suggesting that hooking and grabbing (real hockey-related penalties that take away from the skill and allow inferior teams to look better) should be allowed while unsportsmanlike (disagreeing with a penalty call after MANY no-calls) should be a hefty penalty. You are only saying this because you know the disparity in the skill levels of the two teams.

A little tug with the stick is part of the game, hooks should be called when they are blaitant, but some of the Q refs call the smallest of hooks and dont let anything go which ruins the flow of the game.

No, these are penalties. Maybe you should re-read your rule book before you start suggesting what is and isn't a deserved penalty.

[mrlittlewolf]

sweep you say ARE YOU F**KING nuts???
close game thurs we won 4-1 we outshot you yesterday 40-22
if anyone should be thinking sweep today it should have been us RETARD!!!!

[bjindaho]

what the hell is that

[bjindaho]

2 minutes for them once again gaining the zone by pulling people down.

[Gallant-Unit(14-0-3)]

the animal is lurking now

[bjindaho]

god help them

[griffin]

see, the reffing is pretty even you got a 5 on 3 now.

[griffin]

Big face off lose by Dido in the offensive end. Does he always play centre?

[bjindaho]

no it isn't. and he loses a LOT of faceoffs.

[mrlittlewolf]

wait til next year and that announcer comes here ASSHOLE