|
|
Post by Clubber Lang on Dec 28, 2009 21:19:54 GMT -4
Seems like Bissonette has left the Sags. If he was a key part of the deal for Deschamps what happens now?
|
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Dec 28, 2009 21:21:34 GMT -4
Seems like Bissonette has left the Sags. If he was a key part of the deal for Deschamps what happens now? Not much. He played for them yesterday. IMO, he's just taking a few days to let the trade sink in. |
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Dec 28, 2009 21:22:05 GMT -4
Seems like Bissonette has left the Sags. If he was a key part of the deal for Deschamps what happens now? Chicoutimi deals him  |
|
|
|
Post by Clubber Lang on Dec 28, 2009 21:26:27 GMT -4
Seems like Bissonette has left the Sags. If he was a key part of the deal for Deschamps what happens now? Not much. He played for them yesterday. IMO, he's just taking a few days to let the trade sink in. Yeah, left them after the game www.rds.ca/lhjmq/chroniques/288888.html |
|
|
|
Post by 2forroughing on Dec 28, 2009 21:48:43 GMT -4
If he doesnt report then Moncton has to compensate for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by WHEELsnipePARTY on Dec 28, 2009 21:57:15 GMT -4
surprisingly, its after a 10-1 loss lol
|
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 28, 2009 22:13:43 GMT -4
If he doesnt report then Moncton has to compensate for it. Why? |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Dec 28, 2009 22:27:55 GMT -4
If he doesnt report then Moncton has to compensate for it. why? Unless it was a stipulation in the deal I doubt it has any effect. He is still a prime asset for Chicoutimi. |
|
|
|
Post by 2forroughing on Dec 28, 2009 22:43:04 GMT -4
If he doesnt report then Moncton has to compensate for it. why? Unless it was a stipulation in the deal I doubt it has any effect. He is still a prime asset for Chicoutimi. I dont think its a stipulation in this deal but I always thought If a player does not report to a team that the former team has to pay up a compensation?? Otherwise you could be getting a top tier player for some young guys and the young guys not report and therefore the other team wins the deal...Just an example. |
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Dec 28, 2009 22:48:30 GMT -4
why? Unless it was a stipulation in the deal I doubt it has any effect. He is still a prime asset for Chicoutimi. I dont think its a stipulation in this deal but I always thought If a player does not report to a team that the former team has to pay up a compensation?? Otherwise you could be getting a top tier player for some young guys and the young guys not report and therefore the other team wins the deal...Just an example. But he did report to the team, so even if there was a clause, it would be void. |
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 28, 2009 23:28:54 GMT -4
why? Unless it was a stipulation in the deal I doubt it has any effect. He is still a prime asset for Chicoutimi. I dont think its a stipulation in this deal but I always thought If a player does not report to a team that the former team has to pay up a compensation?? Otherwise you could be getting a top tier player for some young guys and the young guys not report and therefore the other team wins the deal...Just an example. Teams will check in with the players Agent...so if Martel didnt do that, its his fault. |
|
|
|
Post by bois on Dec 29, 2009 9:31:37 GMT -4
he left them after one game? what the hell is the kids problem?
|
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Dec 29, 2009 10:04:41 GMT -4
he left them after one game? what the hell is the kids problem? Its just not Moncton ...  |
|
