|
|
Post by Clubber Lang on Feb 8, 2010 11:18:25 GMT -4
I have to say Lagace doesn't look that impressive for you guys.. I honestly thought he was the better guy to target from Chicoutimi.. but after watching Deschamps in here last week and then Lagace it was no contest.. Deschamps was hands down the better player.... maybe it's attributable to players fitting into certain systems better.. I dunno I would have to agree. I honestly think he will be back as a twenty and traded to a contender to recoup some assets we had traded away. I don't think he is AHL bound next year! Still he is a very good player. |
|
|
|
Post by hal on Feb 8, 2010 11:59:32 GMT -4
Deschamps might be why Legace was leading the Q in goals ............plus he had oodles of ice time......pp....pk. Plus Chicoutimi were not considered a contender so he was a Big Fish in a Little Pond playing with zero pressure .............now that has all changed plus he's playing for a Loon !
|
|
|
|
Post by catnut on Feb 8, 2010 12:04:41 GMT -4
Deschamps might be why Legace was leading the Q in goals ............plus he had oodles of ice time......pp....pk. Plus Chicoutimi were not considered a contender so he was a Big Fish in a Little Pond playing with zero pressure .............now that has all changed plus he's playing for a Loon ! That has to be a first on these boards, someone being called a loon .... in comparison to Martel. |
|
|
|
Post by hal on Feb 8, 2010 15:01:30 GMT -4
Deschamps might be why Legace was leading the Q in goals ............plus he had oodles of ice time......pp....pk. Plus Chicoutimi were not considered a contender so he was a Big Fish in a Little Pond playing with zero pressure .............now that has all changed plus he's playing for a Loon ! That has to be a first on these boards, someone being called a loon .... in comparison to Martel. At least with Martel , you know what your getting.............does anybody on this Board really know what Mario is thinking ? |
|
