|
|
Post by crash on Sept 6, 2010 20:36:28 GMT -4
The Mooseheads have released their current roster, with player numbers. There have been some changes.
3 Desmarais, Simon
4 Bishop, Jamie
7 Lewis, Trey
9 Ryan, Andrew
10 Abeltshauser, Konrad
12 Turbide, Francis
14 Souligny, Alex
16 Randell, Travis
17 Ashley, Darcy
19 Gélinas, Carl
20 Boudreau, Matthew
21 Desjardins, Gabriel
22 Grant, Gerrad
26 Bety, Charles
27 Lemieux, Alex
30 Corbeil-Thériault, Mathieu
31 Delmas, Peter
44 Gillard, Steve
48 Ciampini, Luca
55 Amyot, Pascal
73 Terenzio, Anthony
77 Hannay, Sawyer
79 Andrews, Brent
82 Clarke, Garrett
91 Frk, Martin
|
|
|
|
Post by howitzer on Sept 6, 2010 21:16:04 GMT -4
Terenzio goes with 73 haha.
I liked 63 and 74, but they did away with them this year by the looks of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by CrazyJoeDavola on Sept 6, 2010 22:06:25 GMT -4
What I like about the team is the amount of potential snipers we have... sounds like Ciampini and Frk will be big time shooters, then you have guys like Ryan and Ashley who seem like goal scorers... and Desjardins shot seems to be very much improved and he usually likes to shoot it too. Gelinas is always willing to drive into the crease for a goal.
Then you have the mix of shooting and passing in most other forwards... which leads me to the question, do we have enough or ANY playmakers? Pass first kind of guys, able to do this against top checkers? I see lots of goal scoring ability but no true playmaker. We may need to have someone sort of step up into that role, but I dont see anyone that looks to be that guy.
I havent seen any preseason, but are we lacking in playmaking? Given Cams coaching style (work hard and create chances that way) he`s built a good team of players that should excel in that style, but I do worry about the playmaking on this team.
Still... should be exciting the next few years with lots of guys who can shoot the puck.
|
|
|
|
Post by howitzer on Sept 6, 2010 23:08:42 GMT -4
I would have to say Boudreau is our best pure playmaker. He hasn't shown he can do it at this level yet, but he's had a good camp, and looks to have the potential to be a player maker. He slows the game down, good passer. I'm just not sold on his true potential yet with his lack of speed. Ashley I'd say would be next. He looks like he can be both a goal scorer and a player maker. Great poise and patience with the puck. Grant can make plays as well.
Beyond those guys, ya you're probably right. I'm sure as the building of this team continues that will get addressed. But for this year I'd say it's a fair observation to make.
|
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on Sept 6, 2010 23:17:54 GMT -4
Its funny...before the draft everyone was going on about how we needed a sniper and not a playmaker and thats why we should have taken Ciampini over Gamelin....
|
|
|
|
Post by defresh101 on Sept 6, 2010 23:24:57 GMT -4
I know I am just being silly, but am abit uneasy on Frk's number. Kinda recall last time we depended on #91, and I also believe #20 should be retired...if not right now someday.
|
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on Sept 6, 2010 23:44:25 GMT -4
I know I am just being silly, but am abit uneasy on Frk's number. Kinda recall last time we depended on #91, and I also believe #20 should be retired...if not right now someday. #91 led the team in playoff scoring...just thought id point that out  |
|
|
|
Post by Citris on Sept 6, 2010 23:50:54 GMT -4
82 for Clarke D: , not a fan of that.
Also when we attended the season ticket launch party, my friend said he overheard Terenzio saying that he was going to ask for 73.. thought he was just kinda making stuff up, but there you have it, he has good ears. Weird Goalie number.
Cosmetics aside, very excited to see this team on the ice this year. I am a Canadiens fan so I'm used to my out-there jersey numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by defresh101 on Sept 6, 2010 23:51:37 GMT -4
Lala point well taken. That does makes for a strong case, but still a case you would almost have to be a defensive lawyer to win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reesor on Sept 7, 2010 6:41:39 GMT -4
Do you suppose Clarke changed his number to be less "noticible" by the refs? I figure if the refs saw a # 2 playing for the Mooseheads they might remember his reputation and maybe call something they wouldn't with someone else.
I really hope he's more disiplined this year. He has a huge upside.
|
|
|
|
Post by oilers4ever on Sept 7, 2010 6:55:45 GMT -4
I also believe #20 should be retired...if not right now someday. WHY? |
|
|
|
Post by Murph on Sept 7, 2010 16:17:58 GMT -4
I know I am just being silly, but am abit uneasy on Frk's number. Kinda recall last time we depended on #91, and I also believe #20 should be retired...if not right now someday. #91 led the team in playoff scoring...just thought id point that out Not only was he the leading scorer, but I'm almost positive I recall him missing a game....  |
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on Sept 7, 2010 16:53:02 GMT -4
#91 led the team in playoff scoring...just thought id point that out Not only was he the leading scorer, but I'm almost positive I recall him missing a game.... He had the flu if i re-call  hah |
|
hah