|
Post by christopher on Aug 18, 2009 10:39:04 GMT -4
Not like it matters. Mario would probably just trade him mid-season for another useless player. *cough*Demkov,Tesink*cough* hahahaha Demkov was traded for a draft pick Malka was traded for Tesink....who was far from useless for us last season. You're like the Godfather of the Cape Breton Screaming Eagles organization. hahaha I think I'll just put my foot in my mouth. hahaha Still....a draft pick....I thought there was this huge hype surrounding Demkov. Also, now I'm upset about two trades...hahaha.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Aug 18, 2009 10:45:14 GMT -4
Demkov was traded for a draft pick Malka was traded for Tesink....who was far from useless for us last season. You're like the Godfather of the Cape Breton Screaming Eagles organization. hahaha I think I'll just put my foot in my mouth. hahaha Still....a draft pick....I thought there was this huge hype surrounding Demkov. Also, now I'm upset about two trades...hahaha. Huge hype? No. There was some hype, but we had too much talent and he couldn't find a spot in the lineup. He was able to produce in Bathurst, but they had a much younger and weaker team. And what's with the godfather comment? If you're going to post things that are not true you will be corrected on it 100% of the time.
|
|
|
Post by caperguy on Aug 18, 2009 11:04:09 GMT -4
Not like it matters. Mario would probably just trade him mid-season for another useless player. *cough*Demkov,Tesink*cough* hahahaha Demkov was traded for a draft pick Malka was traded for Tesink....who was far from useless for us last season. yep, agree with you JB
|
|
|
Post by caperguy on Aug 18, 2009 11:06:05 GMT -4
You're like the Godfather of the Cape Breton Screaming Eagles organization. hahaha I think I'll just put my foot in my mouth. hahaha Still....a draft pick....I thought there was this huge hype surrounding Demkov. Also, now I'm upset about two trades...hahaha. Huge hype? No. There was some hype, but we had too much talent and he couldn't find a spot in the lineup. He was able to produce in Bathurst, but they had a much younger and weaker team. And what's with the godfather comment? If you're going to post things that are not true you will be corrected on it 100% of the time. and it's really not necessary to put 'hahaha' after every sentence you write
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Aug 18, 2009 11:29:26 GMT -4
Did you ever think that the reason why this board is inactive most of the time is in relation to the way that new posters are treated?
I'm allowed to have opinions that are not parrellel to yours. I put "hahaha" after posts which I find funny.
Yeah, Tesink was great. His 3 points totally helped us down the stretch.
The Godfather comment was not disprespectful or whatever, if you're taking it that way. I meant it in a way like....you own the show....you know your information.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Aug 18, 2009 11:39:55 GMT -4
Did you ever think that the reason why this board is inactive most of the time is in relation to the way that new posters are treated? I'm allowed to have opinions that are not parrellel to yours. I put "hahaha" after posts which I find funny. Yeah, Tesink was great. His 3 points totally helped us down the stretch. The Godfather comment was not disprespectful or whatever, if you're taking it that way. I meant it in a way like....you own the show....you know your information. The only new posters who have problems here are the ones who spew out garbage with nothing to back it up. The only thing you posted that was an opinion was that you thought Tesink sucked. Your argument is that he only had 3 points. Yet you go back and look over every game thread from late last season and the playoffs and you see tons of praise for a guy who took a role on our team and did his job very well whether it was as a 3rd pairing D or 3rd/4th line banging and crashing winger. You can feel free to have the opinion that he sucked. But don't act like a little girl when someone says you are incorrect. We all disagree here all the time, but out of left field comments are going to get ripped apart whether you've been here for a week or a decade.
|
|
|
Post by MJNICK44 on Aug 18, 2009 11:46:34 GMT -4
I think Tesnik played very well for us last year. I wouldn't mind seeing him back this year as an overager. I know that is highly unlikely but you never know. Tesnik was a great team player and did whatever was asked of him. I do not think he sucked.
|
|
|
Post by sec21critic on Aug 18, 2009 11:53:44 GMT -4
Said it before, been burned by it before, will say it again: Conjecture and guesswork about Euros and whether or not they're coming, and whether or not they'll be impact, is all but useless until training camp comes and they're either there or they're not! Hey, did you hear about Michael Barinka being seen walking around North Sydney yesterday? Heard he had a bandage on his hand or something?
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Aug 18, 2009 11:54:51 GMT -4
I think Tesnik played very well for us last year. I wouldn't mind seeing him back this year as an overager. I know that is highly unlikely but you never know. Tesnik was a great team player and did whatever was asked of him. I do not think he sucked. If we were a lower tier team I think you could definitely make a case for a Tesink or Lavigeur as an overager. But as a team striving to be a top team I think we need more of an impact that a Stinziani should provide. And if not we can upgrade at mid-season and bring in a star overager. I agree 100% with you on his play last year though. That opinion was shared by most last season when we seen Tesink utilized to his strength and put in a position to succeed by realizing his limited skill level and using him as a physical presence.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Aug 18, 2009 11:55:15 GMT -4
Said it before, been burned by it before, will say it again: Conjecture and guesswork about Euros and whether or not they're coming, and whether or not they'll be impact, is all but useless until training camp comes and they're either there or they're not! Hey, did you hear about Michael Barinka being seen walking around North Sydney yesterday? Heard he had a bandage on his hand or something? shut up you
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Aug 18, 2009 11:57:10 GMT -4
Did you ever think that the reason why this board is inactive most of the time is in relation to the way that new posters are treated? I'm allowed to have opinions that are not parrellel to yours. I put "hahaha" after posts which I find funny. Yeah, Tesink was great. His 3 points totally helped us down the stretch. The Godfather comment was not disprespectful or whatever, if you're taking it that way. I meant it in a way like....you own the show....you know your information. The only new posters who have problems here are the ones who spew out garbage with nothing to back it up. The only thing you posted that was an opinion was that you thought Tesink sucked. Your argument is that he only had 3 points. Yet you go back and look over every game thread from late last season and the playoffs and you see tons of praise for a guy who took a role on our team and did his job very well whether it was as a 3rd pairing D or 3rd/4th line banging and crashing winger. You can feel free to have the opinion that he sucked. But don't act like a little girl when someone says you are incorrect. We all disagree here all the time, but out of left field comments are going to get ripped apart whether you've been here for a week or a decade. I made a mistake in regards to the details of a trade. Not a big deal. You corrected me and I appreciate that. I refer to you as the Godfather for having knowledge and then you got your panties in a twist and start accusing me of "acting like a girl". I don't consider having an opinion on something and making a mistake in regards to something "spewing out garbage". Then again, it seems like you take this board VERY seriously so maybe its more of an issue than I suspect. People have opinions. You think Tesink was of value. I don't. You think the trade made sense. I don't. I just started posting on here to engage in some hockey talk, not fight about lame shit. Let's start over and I'll check my resources and cite them before I post again.
|
|
|
Post by MJNICK44 on Aug 18, 2009 12:03:39 GMT -4
Jack you seem to know alot about the eagles and players around the league. It is a pleasure chatting with sound knowledgable hockey fans. I really like Tesnik but I have to agree with you again. I think we should keep Stinz over him. I am alittle bias though liking Tesnik as he is from my hometown. I was also a huge JC Sawyer fan. (Don't bash me!! haha) PS I have followed these boards for a few years but just joined.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Aug 18, 2009 12:09:37 GMT -4
I made a mistake in regards to the details of a trade. Not a big deal. You corrected me and I appreciate that. I refer to you as the Godfather for having knowledge and then you got your panties in a twist and start accusing me of "acting like a girl". I don't consider having an opinion on something and making a mistake in regards to something "spewing out garbage". Then again, it seems like you take this board VERY seriously so maybe its more of an issue than I suspect. People have opinions. You think Tesink was of value. I don't. You think the trade made sense. I don't. I just started posting on here to engage in some hockey talk, not fight about lame shit. Let's start over and I'll check my resources and cite them before I post again. Acting like a girl is posting "hahaha" 3 times in a 4 line post and complaining about me putting down new posters because you posted a rediculous comment like: "Yeah, Tesink was great. His 3 points totally helped us down the stretch" which was dripping of sarcasm even though there was not one poster here complaining about his play last season. You obviously lack reading and comprehension skills, as most new posters who don't last seem to. I never said you making a mistake on a trade was garbage. What is garbage is your opinion that the player sucked. Notice the difference? Because it's a pretty big one. I don't take this board seriously at all. You're the one making a foolish comment with no basis or logic behind it. What exactly were your expectations of Tesink upon his arrival? Because I doubt you even heard of him before he put an Eagle jersey on. Yet you're putting him down when he came here and played very well. If you don't want to start arguments then don't post stupid shit. And saying Tesink sucked last year on the basis that he only put up 3 points is pretty stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Aug 18, 2009 12:12:37 GMT -4
Jack you seem to know alot about the eagles and players around the league. It is a pleasure chatting with sound knowledgable hockey fans. I really like Tesnik but I have to agree with you again. I think we should keep Stinz over him. I am alittle bias though liking Tesnik as he is from my hometown. I was also a huge JC Sawyer fan. (Don't bash me!! haha) PS I have followed these boards for a few years but just joined. Thanks medic. Welcome aboard. It's always great to see more people interested in chatting about the league. And don't worry, I was a Sawyer fan as well. I'll never understand the hate generated by such a talented player, even if it took a little while for him to reach that potential.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Aug 18, 2009 12:29:54 GMT -4
I made a mistake in regards to the details of a trade. Not a big deal. You corrected me and I appreciate that. I refer to you as the Godfather for having knowledge and then you got your panties in a twist and start accusing me of "acting like a girl". I don't consider having an opinion on something and making a mistake in regards to something "spewing out garbage". Then again, it seems like you take this board VERY seriously so maybe its more of an issue than I suspect. People have opinions. You think Tesink was of value. I don't. You think the trade made sense. I don't. I just started posting on here to engage in some hockey talk, not fight about lame shit. Let's start over and I'll check my resources and cite them before I post again. Acting like a girl is posting "hahaha" 3 times in a 4 line post and complaining about me putting down new posters because you posted a rediculous comment like: "Yeah, Tesink was great. His 3 points totally helped us down the stretch" which was dripping of sarcasm even though there was not one poster here complaining about his play last season. You obviously lack reading and comprehension skills, as most new posters who don't last seem to. I never said you making a mistake on a trade was garbage. What is garbage is your opinion that the player sucked. Notice the difference? Because it's a pretty big one. I don't take this board seriously at all. You're the one making a foolish comment with no basis or logic behind it. What exactly were your expectations of Tesink upon his arrival? Because I doubt you even heard of him before he put an Eagle jersey on. Yet you're putting him down when he came here and played very well. If you don't want to start arguments then don't post stupid shit. And saying Tesink sucked last year on the basis that he only put up 3 points is pretty stupid. So, you're definition of "acting like a girl" on a public message board is based on me laughing at a post which I felt was slightly funny. That's odd. I actually don't lack reading or comprehension skills. In fact, I have a minor degree in English. Those in glass houses? My expectations of Tesink was that he'd be a big body with zero offense and guess what.....I was right!!!! Also, I had heard of him before coming to CB. My saying that Tesink sucked because he only put up 3 points is subject to my opinion and saying someone's opinion is stupid is actually more stupid that claiming the aforementioned opinion is, in fact, stupid.
|
|