|
|
Post by Beaver Banker on Nov 9, 2012 15:54:59 GMT -4
1 GWG = 1 point. This would be in addition to the one point already provided (or two already provided to d-men).
One week to vote, 13 yes votes needed to pass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Porkchop on Nov 9, 2012 18:20:14 GMT -4
I don't really like the GWG stat, as it could be the first goal in a 10-0 bashing. I do however, like the polls being finally used for something usefu, instead of the usual crap we see on the boardsl. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Y Ddraig Goch on Nov 9, 2012 19:00:02 GMT -4
I prefer GWG over PPG.
|
|
|
|
Post by Porkchop on Nov 9, 2012 19:33:59 GMT -4
both could be considered good or bad in a hockey pool.....there will be arguments for both sides. a game winning goal in a 6-2 game is not much different than the 6th goal being a pp goal. both are just a free point, not really needed. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Draper on Nov 9, 2012 19:54:25 GMT -4
So do I... and my voting reflects that. I did vote yes to an extra point for SH goals though... those are both rare and random enough that the extra points will be a nice bonus, but won't play a huge factor at the end of the season. |
|
|
|
Post by Porkchop on Nov 9, 2012 20:09:13 GMT -4
I think SHG, are the best to add, of all the stats being considered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beaver Banker on Nov 16, 2012 14:13:44 GMT -4
17 votes. 6 for , 11 against. Motion defeated. GWG will not be added a s a scoring category.
|
|
