|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Oct 6, 2017 6:56:11 GMT -4
Don't bother with him... he will never admit it when he is wrong... just like another certain poster on thr Titan board. ohh strong words from Darlene! You must be his wife? |
|
dar
Blue-Chip Prospect
Posts: 458
|
Post by dar on Oct 6, 2017 11:15:12 GMT -4
Get a life... REALLY... Get a life.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Oct 6, 2017 11:21:59 GMT -4
Get a life... REALLY... Get a life. You're the one that needs a life. You stick your nose in something that had nothing to do with you, trying to look smart. |
|
dar
Blue-Chip Prospect
Posts: 458
|
Post by dar on Oct 6, 2017 11:29:19 GMT -4
No... this board is your life... it's all you seem to be doing... I really suggest you get a life. This can't be healthy for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Oct 6, 2017 11:31:16 GMT -4
No... this board is your life... it's all you seem to be doing... I really suggest you get a life. This can't be healthy for you. I have a very healthy life with lots of time for all kinds of activities, but thanks for your concern. |
|
|
|
Post by riverviewroyal on Oct 6, 2017 11:31:49 GMT -4
Look you douche bag...no I didn't but you know that and this is what you do you twist an argument into something to wasn't because you are a no life loser who only gets self esteem from pretending to be right on a message board. No i didn't pull out +/- and no I didn't analyze anything YOU DID! Is that clear enough for you. I already quoted you once I won't bother again...but I will paraphrase and them just maybe you can answer the one question that was posed... You said Pelltier's +/- was a result of bad opponents not good defensive play...YOU SAID THAT! I asked about MacDonalds poor +/- against the same teams. and YOU SAID it wasn't an issue and too small a sample. So the original question is how do YOU find a meaning in one players good number but no meaning in another players poor number against the same opponents and sample size? That is it that was the question...since then you have spouted bullshit and nonsense...then in a twist of rare stupidity tried to say I spouted off about plus minus...any chance you can answer the original part of the discussion or will you continue to be a keyboard idiot for today and the rest of your life? "You're the guy pulling out +- like it's some kind of great measuring stick...and over FOUR games to boot." Those are YOUR words...so you find 4 games not a good sample...awesome..then why were you able to put down a players defensive effort based on that small sample? YOU are the one that brought it up in the first place, comparing Pelletier's numbers to MacDonald. No matter what moronic explanations you have, nobody with half a brain would use +- to gauge players' performance after FOUR freaking games!!! You want to act like a clown, then argue with yourself. Bottom line, you made a stupid point and now you're making 4 more stupid posts to try and defend it. Ask anybody that works in hockey how much weight they put in plus minus in FOUR games. Sooooo why did you bring up +/- in your original post? You are still also incorrect in your original post anyways by saying Pelletier isn't as good defensively. He is a 200 foot player, if you weren't such a shitty scout and had seen any of the games so far this year you would have maybe seen some of that. All the scouting reports before he was drafted also said the same I think it's time to retire, you're spare parts bud |
|
|
|
Post by donkoharski on Oct 6, 2017 11:38:30 GMT -4
Time to lock this up!
|
|
