|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Mar 2, 2019 9:16:53 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss...
To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend...
1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild)
2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense)
3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues)
4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender)
5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover)
6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return)
7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot)
8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited)
In terms of trade value...
Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd
Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th
Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year
Giguere-see Seitz
Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhiteTyAffair on Mar 2, 2019 9:52:39 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss... To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend... 1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild) 2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense) 3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues) 4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender) 5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover) 6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return) 7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot) 8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited) In terms of trade value... Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year Giguere-see Seitz Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation. I've been told Moncton is getting Victo's 2019 3rd round pick back from Blainville. That was used to acquire Anttalainen. Capannelli would be a good fit there. The Armada only have one 19 year old on their current roster. He could easily be their #1 centre next season. |
|
|
|
Post by scotiahockey on Mar 2, 2019 12:06:37 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss... To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend... 1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild) 2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense) 3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues) 4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender) 5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover) 6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return) 7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot) 8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited) In terms of trade value... Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year Giguere-see Seitz Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation. I've been told Moncton is getting Victo's 2019 3rd round pick back from Blainville. That was used to acquire Anttalainen. Capannelli would be a good fit there. The Armada only have one 19 year old on their current roster. He could easily be their #1 centre next season. Luke Henman will probably be their #1 C unless he gets moved. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Mar 2, 2019 12:10:23 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss... To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend... 1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild) 2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense) 3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues) 4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender) 5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover) 6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return) 7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot) 8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited) In terms of trade value... Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year Giguere-see Seitz Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation. I've been told Moncton is getting Victo's 2019 3rd round pick back from Blainville. That was used to acquire Anttalainen. Capannelli would be a good fit there. The Armada only have one 19 year old on their current roster. He could easily be their #1 centre next season. That wouldn't be awful, but was hoping for a 2nd. They are going to easily lose 2-3 rounds or more on the Giguere Huntley Annttalainen deals. |
|
|
|
Post by misconduct on Mar 2, 2019 20:32:31 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss... To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend... 1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild) 2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense) 3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues) 4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender) 5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover) 6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return) 7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot) 8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited) In terms of trade value... Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year Giguere-see Seitz Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation. I'd prefer to keep Capannelli over Cyr. I think he's improving all the time. Cyr will be a solid player I just think Capannelli will hit another level. |
|
shawn
Draft Pick
Posts: 10 
|
Post by shawn on Mar 2, 2019 22:49:29 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss... To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend... 1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild) 2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense) 3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues) 4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender) 5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover) 6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return) 7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot) 8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited) In terms of trade value... Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year Giguere-see Seitz Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation. I'd prefer to keep Capannelli over Cyr. I think he's improving all the time. Cyr will be a solid player I just think Capannelli will hit another level. I would too, just for the fact that he wins a lot more faceoffs than Cyr. |
|
|
|
Post by scotiahockey on Mar 2, 2019 22:56:55 GMT -4
I'd prefer to keep Capannelli over Cyr. I think he's improving all the time. Cyr will be a solid player I just think Capannelli will hit another level. I would too, just for the fact that he wins a lot more faceoffs than Cyr. The stats say otherwise. In fact it’s Cyr by a pretty significant margin. Cyr- 1055 faceoffs this season, 55.1 win % Capannelli- 917 faceoffs this season, 50.9 win % |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Mar 2, 2019 23:48:23 GMT -4
Hodge had an article on this so let's discuss... To me, this is the pecking order...assuming they want to contend... 1-McKenna 5 star(he is a lock unless he signs pro or they chose to rebuild) 2-Aspirot 3.5 star(solid stay at home guy with a bit of offense) 3-Cyr 3.5 star(point per game forward, durability issues) 4-Campanneli 3 star(should play somewhere, a 3rd liner on a contender) 5-Huntley 3 star(should have a spot, solid 2nd pair puck mover) 6-Seitz 2.5 star(is not a lock to play in the Q, depend on how many 1999's return) 7-Giguere 2.5 star(similar to Seitz, might or might not have a spot) 8-Anttailainen 2 star(could play if he wasn't a Euro, market will be limited) In terms of trade value... Capannelli-possibly as much as a 2nd rounder, safe bet for a 3rd Huntley-should be worth a 3rd, at worse a 4th Seitz-could be worth a conditional 5th or 6th if he sticks all year Giguere-see Seitz Anttalainen-possibly a late rounder in the right situation. I'd prefer to keep Capannelli over Cyr. I think he's improving all the time. Cyr will be a solid player I just think Capannelli will hit another level. I don't see much more offense in his game, he does it a game here and there but not consistently. |
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Mar 3, 2019 11:53:42 GMT -4
I'd keep Cyr over Campanelli. Cyr creates offense and can handle the puck significantly better. Campanelli has better size and speed but Cyr is one of the smartest players we have.
|
|
|
|
Post by novycatsfan on Mar 3, 2019 12:37:46 GMT -4
I'd keep Cyr over Campanelli. Cyr creates offense and can handle the puck significantly better. Campanelli has better size and speed but Cyr is one of the smartest players we have. I agree. You possibly get more in return for Cyr , especially if he has a great fall. |
|
|
|
Post by WhiteTyAffair on Mar 3, 2019 12:49:40 GMT -4
I'd keep Cyr over Campanelli. Cyr creates offense and can handle the puck significantly better. Campanelli has better size and speed but Cyr is one of the smartest players we have. I like to take a drink every time Capannelli loses control of the puck entering the offensive zone. |
|
|
|
Post by pinkbeaver on Mar 3, 2019 20:51:28 GMT -4
I'd keep Cyr over Campanelli. Cyr creates offense and can handle the puck significantly better. Campanelli has better size and speed but Cyr is one of the smartest players we have. I like to take a drink every time Capannelli loses control of the puck entering the offensive zone. Haha this post is great. I think what you see is what you get with Capannelli. With Cyr, this is his first full year healthy. I could see him taking a huge step forward production wise in his overage season. I don't think it would be crazy to think he could put up number like Asselin did this year with Halifax. As many overageers do, Asselin went from a point per game player to around a 1.33/ppg. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmy on Mar 4, 2019 8:42:53 GMT -4
I think it is close between Cyr and Capanelli ... Cyr is 61 points in 60 games, Capanelli is 44 points in 53 games ... but Cyr has played exclusively with top 6 players, usually on top line, while Capanelli has played more on the third line with less skilled linemates. Cyr also gets more PP time. Capanelli is better defensively.
Likely comes down to a combination of what the market is like for each, and how the coaching staff feels about each when it comes to the stuff we don't necessarily see as fans - work ethic, leadership, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Mar 4, 2019 10:23:24 GMT -4
I think it is close between Cyr and Capanelli ... Cyr is 61 points in 60 games, Capanelli is 44 points in 53 games ... but Cyr has played exclusively with top 6 players, usually on top line, while Capanelli has played more on the third line with less skilled linemates. Cyr also gets more PP time. Capanelli is better defensively. Likely comes down to a combination of what the market is like for each, and how the coaching staff feels about each when it comes to the stuff we don't necessarily see as fans - work ethic, leadership, etc. Cyr has more upside offensively that I don’t see in Campannelli. I just don’t see him as a top 2 center on a championship team. If they want to win next year they’ll have to go all in, Halifax will be strong and loading up also. |
|
