|
|
Post by JEagle on Jun 16, 2022 19:31:04 GMT -4
I haven't seen Preston Pattengale's name mentioned as a D candidate. When does trading period begin?July 2nd at 10a.m. AST is what I have marked down. As for Pattengale a few months ago I thought he had a shot at making the team and maybe he still does but with the rumored addition of Biakabutuka and rumours we're drafting defenceman Thomas Lavoie 1st Overall should he agree to report it's becoming less and less likely that they'll have a spot for him. Edit: assuming Biakabutuka and Lavoie happen these are the guys who he'd have to beat out for a spot. Romain Rodzinski 20yo Jérémie Biakabutuka 20yo Jacob Squires 19yo Conor Shortall 19yo Jérémy Langlois 19yo François-James Buteau 18yo Emile Perron 17yo Xavier Daigle 17yo Thomas Lavoie 16yo |
|
|
|
Post by justathought on Jun 16, 2022 21:24:28 GMT -4
It will be very interesting to see how many of these rumours and possibilities; Lawrence, Biakabutuka, Ivan and Lavoie actually work out!
|
|
|
|
Post by habsfan29 on Jun 17, 2022 0:11:32 GMT -4
I haven't seen Preston Pattengale's name mentioned as a D candidate. When does trading period begin?July 2nd at 10a.m. AST is what I have marked down. As for Pattengale a few months ago I thought he had a shot at making the team and maybe he still does but with the rumored addition of Biakabutuka and rumours we're drafting defenceman Thomas Lavoie 1st Overall should he agree to report it's becoming less and less likely that they'll have a spot for him. Edit: assuming Biakabutuka and Lavoie happen these are the guys who he'd have to beat out for a spot. Romain Rodzinski 20yo Jérémie Biakabutuka 20yo Jacob Squires 19yo Conor Shortall 19yo Jérémy Langlois 19yo François-James Buteau 18yo Emile Perron 17yo Xavier Daigle 17yo Thomas Lavoie 16yo I can still see a scenario where Pattengale could crack the roster… I don’t envision Rodzinski being back (especially with the rumours about Biakabutuka and Lawrence). I can also see either Shortall or Squires being moved (if Langlois stays for now) to make room for some of our younger guys who need to play to gain experience. So if the 2 scenarios above Play out, I think Pattengale could very well be our 8th D. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2022 7:37:53 GMT -4
I like Pattengale, but I think he is on the outside looking in. I think we are all hoping that the plan for this team, assuming it sticks is 05/06 birth years and Pattengale is an 04. Assuming we take a D at #1 and Daigle has a good camp, there is no room and I highly doubt they will open the season with 8 D. Pattengale would be better served to start the year in Pictou where he should get some good mins, PP time..and then possiblly make the jump to the Eagles if trades open up room at x-mas.
Now if I am Sly, I am still looking to get another 05 on the back end and Langlois would be a great fit for a few teams who have some nice prospects.
Carriere in Sherbrooke, Hebert in Gatineau, Martin in Halifax are on the top of my shopping list.
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Jun 21, 2022 12:33:28 GMT -4
I think you are overestimating SJ's depth lol Right now, if Lawrence is headed to Cape Breton, SJ would have: MacDonald Trenholm Reynolds a 20 After that, the depth drops to guys like Burbidge, Elie, Simard, and Laforge. This isn't really a team that can afford to trade away a decent 19 (unless SJ can somehow get enough assets back from excess 20s to insulate better). Wouldn't Trenholm be a 19 ? MacDonald, Trenholm and Reynolds would be 19. If Lawrence is headed to CB, I'm interested in seeing the return. |
|
|
|
Post by eagleeye on Jun 21, 2022 13:47:31 GMT -4
Trenholm
3rd 22
3rd 23
for
Savoie
McCluskey
1st 24
7th 24
8th 24 and Lawrence
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Jun 21, 2022 13:53:09 GMT -4
Trenholm 3rd 22 3rd 23 for Savoie McCluskey 1st 24 7th 24 8th 24 and Lawrence No, that doesn't work Even as a future, SJ isn't going to move Lawrence a 2 and a 3 for a 2 and a 3. There would have to be more to this trade. |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Jun 21, 2022 14:09:01 GMT -4
Trenholm 3rd 22 3rd 23 for Savoie McCluskey 1st 24 7th 24 8th 24 and Lawrence No, that doesn't work Even as a future, SJ isn't going to move Lawrence a 2 and a 3 for a 2 and a 3. There would have to be more to this trade. I'm sure if the deal was solely based on the original it would be Lawrence for a 2nd and 3rd leaving the deal as Trenholm, 2nd, 3 3rd's for that return. I wouldnt be shocked if CB sent some extra bodies to SJ on the other end of it as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Jun 21, 2022 14:11:12 GMT -4
No, that doesn't work Even as a future, SJ isn't going to move Lawrence a 2 and a 3 for a 2 and a 3. There would have to be more to this trade. I'm sure if the deal was solely based on the original it would be Lawrence for a 2nd and 3rd leaving the deal as Trenholm, 2nd, 3 3rd's for that return. I wouldnt be shocked if CB sent some extra bodies to SJ on the other end of it as well. Honestly, it wouldn't shock me if it ended up being something like what eagleeye posted only with a guy like Daigle going to SJ as the extra piece to make it work. |
|
|
|
Post by JEagle on Jun 21, 2022 14:18:10 GMT -4
I don't see SJ getting a guy like Daigle in return for Lawrence personally maybe something like.
2022 1st 11th Overall
2024 3rd
F - Lucas Canning 18yo
Honestly who knows what it will be in the end at least we'll know by next week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2022 14:21:30 GMT -4
Shocked if they move Daigle in this deal, given the position SJ is in, they are not getting full value for their aging roster. SJ will need bodies, I can see the local guy Lyons and possibly a guy like Pattengale but no way CB gives up an 05 at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Jun 21, 2022 14:21:45 GMT -4
I don't see SJ getting a guy like Daigle in return for Lawrence personally maybe something like. 2022 1st 11th Overall 2024 3rd F - Lucas Canning 18yo Honestly who knows what it will be in the end at least we'll know by next week. That is close to what I think his value would be on the open market. I'm just not sure that Daigle has a spot in CB and if he was tied the CB trades, you could get Lawrence cheaper Langlois - Shortall Perron - Squires Biakabatuka - Lavoie Buteau (Yes, I understand that Langlois is likely to be traded, but until that happens, he should be penciled in, especially since the teams that are contending all have significant D prospects that would likely be in an offer for him). |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Jun 21, 2022 14:21:58 GMT -4
I'm sure if the deal was solely based on the original it would be Lawrence for a 2nd and 3rd leaving the deal as Trenholm, 2nd, 3 3rd's for that return. I wouldnt be shocked if CB sent some extra bodies to SJ on the other end of it as well. Honestly, it wouldn't shock me if it ended up being something like what eagleeye posted only with a guy like Daigle going to SJ as the extra piece to make it work. It definitely could be bigger. On the surface the Mem Cup host giving up a top 20 for a 2nd and 3rd after the season in a futures deal wouldnt be a huge shock. I can see guys like Canning and Jacob Squires going to SJ. I'd be surprised to see a Daigle involved. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2022 14:28:30 GMT -4
I don't see CB breaking up the Squires brothers just yet and I am confident Daigle will be given a solid opportunity this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Jun 21, 2022 14:38:44 GMT -4
I don't see CB breaking up the Squires brothers just yet and I am confident Daigle will be given a solid opportunity this season. I would agree but there's potential for a lot of bodies on the blueline, too. If Lavoie agrees to report I can see a Squires or Shortall being the odd man out. |
|
