|
|
Post by ysj28 on Oct 26, 2024 11:01:10 GMT -4
Highlights:
- Marc-Olivier Heredia no longer the head-scout
- Nicolas Lepore will become the head scout - comes from the Quebec Remparts
- Marc-Olivier Roussel will be returning as a scout for the Sea Dogs. He's been with the Remparts as well as a player agent at Wasserman.
|
|
|
|
Post by qfan24 on Oct 28, 2024 8:32:28 GMT -4
Highlights:
- Marc-Olivier Heredia no longer the head-scout
- Nicolas Lepore will become the head scout - comes from the Quebec Remparts
- Marc-Olivier Roussel will be returning as a scout for the Sea Dogs. He's been with the Remparts as well as a player agent at Wasserman.
Head scout was Stella wing man so no surprise there unfortunately. Although I see great selection in their 2007-2008 core, still not sure why they were let go. Maybe Crickard didn't agree with some signings of some of these guys? We have a great looking team, looking forward to the next couple months |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Oct 28, 2024 9:24:47 GMT -4
Highlights: - Marc-Olivier Heredia no longer the head-scout
- Nicolas Lepore will become the head scout - comes from the Quebec Remparts
- Marc-Olivier Roussel will be returning as a scout for the Sea Dogs. He's been with the Remparts as well as a player agent at Wasserman.
Head scout was Stella wing man so no surprise there unfortunately. Although I see great selection in their 2007-2008 core, still not sure why they were let go. Maybe Crickard didn't agree with some signings of some of these guys? We have a great looking team, looking forward to the next couple months Heredia wasn't let go. When Crickard became GM, he mentioned that some of the scouts would likely leave out of loyalty to Stella. |
|
|
|
Post by ysj28 on Oct 28, 2024 9:35:53 GMT -4
Heredia wasn't let go. When Crickard became GM, he mentioned that some of the scouts would likely leave out of loyalty to Stella. The article mentioned he was let go. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Oct 28, 2024 9:39:15 GMT -4
Heredia wasn't let go. When Crickard became GM, he mentioned that some of the scouts would likely leave out of loyalty to Stella. The article mentioned he was let go. The article was written by the same person who took pot shots at Georgie about Stella being let go. Just because Lalancette wrote it doesn't mean it's true, especially now that "facts" aren't important to his reporting. |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Oct 28, 2024 9:53:03 GMT -4
The article mentioned he was let go. The article was written by the same person who took pot shots at Georgie about Stella being let go. Just because Lalancette wrote it doesn't mean it's true, especially now that "facts" aren't important to his reporting. OK but he's paid to be a journalist so is it just SJ stuff you won't believe because you also can't just discount one of the few reporters in the league because you don't like the way he reports his facts either. If you have no proof of this just ignore it. Saying its not true because of who it came from when he's a legit journalist and you have no proof he's wrong isn't a great stance to take. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Oct 28, 2024 10:04:37 GMT -4
The article was written by the same person who took pot shots at Georgie about Stella being let go. Just because Lalancette wrote it doesn't mean it's true, especially now that "facts" aren't important to his reporting. OK but he's paid to be a journalist so is it just SJ stuff you won't believe because you also can't just discount one of the few reporters in the league because you don't like the way he reports his facts either. If you have no proof of this just ignore it. Saying its not true because of who it came from when he's a legit journalist and you have no proof he's wrong isn't a great stance to take. He's not reporting facts. He's making a statement without anything to back it up. Considering this is a direct contradiction from Crickard's statement, I would be inclined to believe the guy who has firsthand knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Oct 28, 2024 10:09:23 GMT -4
OK but he's paid to be a journalist so is it just SJ stuff you won't believe because you also can't just discount one of the few reporters in the league because you don't like the way he reports his facts either. If you have no proof of this just ignore it. Saying its not true because of who it came from when he's a legit journalist and you have no proof he's wrong isn't a great stance to take. He's not reporting facts. He's making a statement without anything to back it up. Considering this is a direct contradiction from Crickard's statement, I would be inclined to believe the guy who has firsthand knowledge of the situation. He's a reporter. He doesn't have to disclose how he can back it up. How do you know both sides don't believe it unfolded in a different way but with the same end result? The GM can say what he wants. If the dismissed employee and 1 other person can back up another side of the story it can be reported as fact to the journalist. Unless you've talked to either side yourself you're just going off of 1 liners in articles that could easily have happened in a different way based on each unique case. Maybe 4 scouts feel they left on their own and 1 feels he was fired and has the paperwork to prove it. The point is that for as much as you say the journalist doesn't know what we do know is he has some ethical process to follow. |
|
|
|
Post by ysj28 on Nov 5, 2024 12:54:18 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by briansjnb on Nov 5, 2024 13:48:08 GMT -4
Awkward...  |
|
