mik
Draft Pick
Posts: 83
|
Post by mik on Sept 15, 2007 10:14:19 GMT -4
they got 1 pt. dispite playying half of the game shorthanded.
For whatever reason being undisciplned or officials.
If Titan is considered one of the top teams , the Cats are going to give them a run for their money.
|
|
mik
Draft Pick
Posts: 83
|
Post by mik on Sept 15, 2007 10:16:58 GMT -4
And lets not forget the tying goal was a fluke, off the glass and off Riopel.
|
|
mik
Draft Pick
Posts: 83
|
Post by mik on Sept 15, 2007 10:22:48 GMT -4
Riopel looked good too.
|
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Sept 15, 2007 10:33:16 GMT -4
Looked good ... yes ... but still gave up 6 goals. |
|
mik
Draft Pick
Posts: 83
|
Post by mik on Sept 15, 2007 10:48:21 GMT -4
Don't forget Steve 4 goals were on the powerplayand 1 was a unlucky bounce.
|
|
|
|
Post by senators19 on Sept 15, 2007 10:52:09 GMT -4
Don't forget Steve 4 goals were on the powerplayand 1 was a unlucky bounce. If they keep playing as undisciplined as they did last night then they had better improve the penalty kill because they are going to spend a lot of time using it. |
|
|
|
Post by Steeler1 on Sept 15, 2007 11:02:23 GMT -4
And lets not forget the tying goal was a fluke, off the glass and off Riopel. For the record, the puck bounced off the glass and Clendenning hit it in about waist high. It was no more a fluke than Tardiff being shoved into the net after he had made the save. He didn't look so good on the first goal from behind the net. |
|
mik
Draft Pick
Posts: 83
|
Post by mik on Sept 15, 2007 11:07:09 GMT -4
Maybe Clendenning should be playing Baseball too.
|
|
mik
Draft Pick
Posts: 83
|
Post by mik on Sept 15, 2007 11:08:34 GMT -4
Waist high must have been a strike.
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawk on Sept 15, 2007 11:10:12 GMT -4
I was sure Clendenning batted it out of the air (I sit behind the net it was scored in) and it was credited to him but on the Q site it says Messier scored it?
|
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Sept 15, 2007 11:20:43 GMT -4
Don't forget Steve 4 goals were on the powerplayand 1 was a unlucky bounce. I don't blame Riopel for the loss ... but he gave up 6 goals ... and we aren't going to beat anybody giving up 6 goals. He has to step up and shut the door when his team isn't ... thats what makes a good goaltender great. I don't call 6 goals on 40 shots a good performance ... even though I saw him make several good saves. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Sept 15, 2007 12:05:24 GMT -4
Don't forget Steve 4 goals were on the powerplayand 1 was a unlucky bounce. I don't blame Riopel for the loss ... but he gave up 6 goals ... and we aren't going to beat anybody giving up 6 goals. He has to step up and shut the door when his team isn't ... thats what makes a good goaltender great. I don't call 6 goals on 40 shots a good performance ... even though I saw him make several good saves. I thought he had a very good game, the overall defensive play was very poor in terms of defensive coverage. that's to be expected with 4 new d-men, give them a few weeks and you should see a difference...once they get their feet wet and know their partner a bit. |
|
bikerboy
Blue-Chip Prospect
i am french so sorry for my English
Posts: 427
|
Post by bikerboy on Sept 15, 2007 13:06:38 GMT -4
ok steve were you at the game last night , riopel did a verry verry good job all the goal expect one was is fault unlucky bounce , he did i don t know how many save with is trapper and keep the team in the game , we got the goal from #14 bathurst that was a some what goal that could go for ages to conplain about and the other goal were tic tac toe plays , he got 40 shot on goal and he was rush out how don t know how many times . yes he give up six goal nothing really he could do about it . for the rest the defence could of done way better .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2007 13:54:34 GMT -4
I don't blame Riopel for the loss ... but he gave up 6 goals ... and we aren't going to beat anybody giving up 6 goals. He has to step up and shut the door when his team isn't ... thats what makes a good goaltender great. I don't call 6 goals on 40 shots a good performance ... even though I saw him make several good saves. I thought he had a very good game, the overall defensive play was very poor in terms of defensive coverage. that's to be expected with 4 new d-men, give them a few weeks and you should see a difference...once they get their feet wet and know their partner a bit. He played OK at best. 3 of the 6 goals were weak, one almost got thru...he looked behind but it was stuck under his arm (looked shacky at times). IMO, there were other players on the team deserving of that 3rd star. |
|
|
|
Post by CatsFan on Sept 15, 2007 14:18:35 GMT -4
IMO, there were other players on the team deserving of that 3rd star. I think Lessard deserved a star before Riopel. He had 2 g, 1a. |
|
