|
|
Post by canucklehead on Jan 21, 2008 11:13:02 GMT -4
3 in 3 is just an excuse ive done it sure its tough but you just got to bare down and suck it up there are times you dont play for a week and have no legs just the way it is . these are kids that are in much better shape than i ever was i bet the 3 in 3 is alot easier than alot of people think. now if they were my age they would need oxygen tanks on the bench lol theres no reason the dogs shouldnt get up for a battle of 1st (which they did ) An excuse what hockey are you playing house league or something? I'm sure they did bare down they grinded out a point against a very skilled offense. Gimmie a break ;D |
|
|
|
Post by elementz on Jan 21, 2008 12:44:33 GMT -4
Will Halifax be looking at bringing someone else on board or are they finished? Not sure how that is possible since the trade deadline has since passed. Unless you meant bringing somebody up from Jr A or AAA which wouldn't make a whole lot of sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Judas In My Mind on Jan 21, 2008 13:19:33 GMT -4
It is reddogbluedog. His key to success is playing the fourth line guys. I'm not surprised he now thinks a key for Halifax might be play their 5th line more. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by reddogbluedog on Jan 21, 2008 14:53:59 GMT -4
Yes elementz is there the chance that someone from a Junior A team could be brought on board. They are a great team and maybe they just need a little more time to gel but they seemed to be missing something compared to teams that took runs at the Mem Cup in the past.
Are the Middle Schools closed today or is Leask home sick?
|
|
|
|
Post by canbeer on Jan 21, 2008 14:56:38 GMT -4
My point is...some 3 in 3 are tougher than others...which is what you just said  And what I was saying is 3 in 3 is just that ....3 in 3 ......I never said anything about "intangibles"....we're arguing two different arguments  . Fatigue is an "intangible" |
|
|
|
Post by bjindaho on Jan 21, 2008 14:56:44 GMT -4
wouldn't you know?
|
|
.