|
|
Post by Citris on Nov 19, 2013 12:29:45 GMT -4
Oh yea, Forgot about Pisarik because hes been a healthy scratch every game the Titan were in hali lol... Siska also because of that whole 0 games played thing lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by gtsoc on Nov 19, 2013 12:54:45 GMT -4
Grigorenko assigned to Rochester on a 2 week conditioning assignment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Murph on Nov 19, 2013 13:00:00 GMT -4
Grigorenko assigned to Rochester on a 2 week conditioning assignment. So basically they have until after the world juniors to make a decision. I'm guessing thr Remparts would have a trade ready to go if he were returned, whether Grigorenko or Sorensen. |
|
|
|
Post by sc74 on Nov 19, 2013 13:07:03 GMT -4
If Buffalo returns him after the trade deadline in January, Quebec can play with three euros.
|
|
|
|
Post by Murph on Nov 19, 2013 13:15:03 GMT -4
If Buffalo returns him after the trade deadline in January, Quebec can play with three euros. I would still expect a trade. Just because they can, doesn't mean they should or will, considering all three are likely headed for the AHL next year (or NHL). If it were Halifax for example, then you may have a case for them to sit Meier, who's a late 17 with two more years left, and dress Grigorenko. But that's not Quebec's situation. I would guess they'd be trading somebody. A move made with next year in mind. |
|
|
|
Post by sc74 on Nov 19, 2013 13:35:16 GMT -4
I wonder if another team could play with three euros if Grigorenko is traded to them?
Example: Quebec trades Grigorenko to Halifax tomorrow. Grigorenko is in the AHL, the goes to Russia's camp for the WJC, comes back from the WJC, the trade deadline passes in the Q and Buffalo sends him back. Technically, Halifax could dress Grigorenko, Ehlers and Meier for the rest of the year.
Last year, the CHL informed Roy that he could have player with three euros only after he traded away Kucherov.
The rule says that if a NHL team sends a euro back after the end of the QMJHL's trade deadline, you can dress him and your two other euros. We've never seen such a thing though.
It could happen for London too if Pittsburgh send Maatta back after the OHL trade deadline.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citris on Nov 19, 2013 14:17:05 GMT -4
I wonder if another team could play with three euros if Grigorenko is traded to them? Example: Quebec trades Grigorenko to Halifax tomorrow. Grigorenko is in the AHL, the goes to Russia's camp for the WJC, comes back from the WJC, the trade deadline passes in the Q and Buffalo sends him back. Technically, Halifax could dress Grigorenko, Ehlers and Meier for the rest of the year. Last year, the CHL informed Roy that he could have player with three euros only after he traded away Kucherov. The rule says that if a NHL team sends a euro back after the end of the QMJHL's trade deadline, you can dress him and your two other euros. We've never seen such a thing though. It could happen for London too if Pittsburgh send Maatta back after the OHL trade deadline. If we could dress Griggs and still keep Ehlers and Meier in the line-up, oh boy. Pretty big longshot tho. |
|
|
|
Post by Judas In My Mind on Nov 19, 2013 14:33:52 GMT -4
The rule says that if a NHL team sends a euro back after the end of the QMJHL's trade deadline, you can dress him and your two other euros. We've never seen such a thing though. It could happen for London too if Pittsburgh send Maatta back after the OHL trade deadline. WTF I hope that's not correct. I could understand being able to keep 3 Euros on your roster if that happened but you shouldn't be able to dress all 3 of them together for a game. That's garbage. It would be like having the rights to a 20 year old player who surprisingly after the deadline gets sent back to the Q, so you're allowed to dress 4 of them. I don't agree with being allowed to dress 3 Euros in any circumstances at all. |
|
|
|
Post by bois on Nov 19, 2013 14:41:38 GMT -4
where's the rule that says they can dress 3 Euros?
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmy on Nov 19, 2013 14:43:34 GMT -4
where's the rule that says they can dress 3 Euros? For that matter, does anyone have a link to the rules about which Euros can and can't be traded, when you need to drop a euro vs. have a 3rd one on your list, etc.? |
|
|
|
Post by sc74 on Nov 19, 2013 14:58:52 GMT -4
The rule says that if a NHL team sends a euro back after the end of the QMJHL's trade deadline, you can dress him and your two other euros. We've never seen such a thing though. It could happen for London too if Pittsburgh send Maatta back after the OHL trade deadline. WTF I hope that's not correct. I could understand being able to keep 3 Euros on your roster if that happened but you shouldn't be able to dress all 3 of them together for a game. That's garbage. It would be like having the rights to a 20 year old player who surprisingly after the deadline gets sent back to the Q, so you're allowed to dress 4 of them. I don't agree with being allowed to dress 3 Euros in any circumstances at all. It came out last Spring in the news. tvasports.ca/hockey/lhjmq/servi-de-cobayes-roy-16042013 |
|
|
|
Post by johnstrow on Nov 19, 2013 15:20:56 GMT -4
there is talk now he is not comping back and the conditioning stint is for him to get more ice time and go play world jr's. once thats over maybe back to buffalo??? strange situation for sure
|
|
|
|
Post by Penguins23® on Nov 19, 2013 15:26:13 GMT -4
David Pagnotta ?@thefourthperiod 24m
With regards to BUF's Grigorenko, I can confirm he will not be sent back to Quebec/the QMJHL after his conditioning stint. Will remain up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Nov 20, 2013 8:02:31 GMT -4
I guess he is going...nowhere...
David Pagnotta ?@thefourthperiod 7h According to a well placed source, the NHL wouldn't approve Grigorenko's conditioning stint to Rochester. He will be heading back to Buffalo
|
|
|
|
Post by Citris on Nov 20, 2013 8:58:50 GMT -4
Good news. Allowing a 19 year old to play in the AHL would have set a precedent I don't want set.
|
|
