|
Post by eastcoastfan on Nov 19, 2009 13:55:58 GMT -4
I think its safe to say that LALA has a problem assessing D-Man so we will dismiss his comments with regards to Hannay, Gillard and Bishop, heres was his comments about Lomano at his draft, LALA stated that " he plays a similar game to Bruno Gervais " ( enough said ), while assessing D-men is weak, he does show a talent for assessing forwards as noted when he said of Sid The Kid at the same draft " He is the best offensive player in the draft and he is responsible in his own end " OH NO hold that last thought heres what he said about Kenzie Sheppard ( believe it or not ) I quote "Kenzie is a great player, he plays a game similar to PETER FORSBERG " and at last report they are a couple of pending lawsuits one by Patenaude and the other by Forsberg. LOL Now based on this would you believe that Hannay would be no better than a JF Brault or that Gillard will not be a 3/4 Dman in this league. I don't know what you are trying to prove here but don't speak for the rest of us in dismissing LALA's comments. We value LALA's opinion and scouting reports. That doesn't mean he's always right , nobody is especially when it comes to predicting future talent. You're not gonna win this one, pal, so cut your losses and move on.
|
|
|
Post by BenCurtis on Nov 19, 2009 14:01:51 GMT -4
Hey Lala, I appreciate your opinions as do most of the posters ON ALL BOARDS, you provide an insight from the scouting end thats very much appreciated by all. BUT you are not above being audited when you make statements that are far from being accurate such as the Hannay comparison to Brault, the Gillard statement that he will not be a top 4 d-man on this team when clearly his play to date indicates that he will. Please keep scouting and reporting and I will keep auditing the good and the bad, so think before you type. And quit slapping yourself on the back with statements like it took me to go back to 2003 to dig up examples of you when your performance wasn't up to par, everyone knows that you are going to be wrong sometimes, so don't worry about that, just keep everything in perspective and keep up the good work its appreciated by us all. While we're doing audits, I spent 2 mintues and found a couple of nice ones.... Danny Dallaire, Guillaume Lavallee and Jeremy Duchesne all of these had great careers here in Halifax and so will Pelletier. Good Call.... Cam will be Coach of the Year for the season 2007/08. Take it to the bank. Good Call.... Your obsession with everything Lalalaprise is anything but subtle.
|
|
|
Post by howitzer on Nov 19, 2009 14:07:50 GMT -4
Hey Lala, I appreciate your opinions as do most of the posters ON ALL BOARDS, you provide an insight from the scouting end thats very much appreciated by all. BUT you are not above being audited when you make statements that are far from being accurate such as the Hannay comparison to Brault, the Gillard statement that he will not be a top 4 d-man on this team when clearly his play to date indicates that he will. Please keep scouting and reporting and I will keep auditing the good and the bad, so think before you type. And quit slapping yourself on the back with statements like it took me to go back to 2003 to dig up examples of you when your performance wasn't up to par, everyone knows that you are going to be wrong sometimes, so don't worry about that, just keep everything in perspective and keep up the good work its appreciated by us all. Explain how you can take issue with someone's opinion when that opinion or observation has every chance at being accurate as your opinion?? Both Hannay and Gillard at 17 and are 20 games into their major junior career, a lot can happen, and a lot can change. The fact someone might see a certain player differently then you, or see them developing differently then you doesn't make them wrong and you right. You take issue with lala comments on these 2. Gillard has every chance at being a 1-2 defencemen as he does a 5-6, and Hannay may develop into a tough guy or he may not. Fact is both are too young to definitively say one way or another. You can't sit there and say just because a young player has played well for a stretch of games that he will absolutely be a top 4 guy. He may, he may not, but you can't call someone out just because they aren't as head over heels for a player as you are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2009 14:17:29 GMT -4
Hey Lala, I appreciate your opinions as do most of the posters ON ALL BOARDS, you provide an insight from the scouting end thats very much appreciated by all. BUT you are not above being audited when you make statements that are far from being accurate such as the Hannay comparison to Brault, the Gillard statement that he will not be a top 4 d-man on this team when clearly his play to date indicates that he will. Please keep scouting and reporting and I will keep auditing the good and the bad, so think before you type. And quit slapping yourself on the back with statements like it took me to go back to 2003 to dig up examples of you when your performance wasn't up to par, everyone knows that you are going to be wrong sometimes, so don't worry about that, just keep everything in perspective and keep up the good work its appreciated by us all. While we're doing audits, I spent 2 mintues and found a couple of nice ones.... Good Call.... Cam will be Coach of the Year for the season 2007/08. Take it to the bank. Good Call.... Your obsession with everything Lalalaprise is anything but subtle. PRICELESS!!!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by elementz on Nov 19, 2009 14:20:22 GMT -4
We would need a team of auditors to audit certain members posts on here.
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on Nov 19, 2009 14:43:03 GMT -4
Hey Lala, I appreciate your opinions as do most of the posters ON ALL BOARDS, you provide an insight from the scouting end thats very much appreciated by all. BUT you are not above being audited when you make statements that are far from being accurate such as the Hannay comparison to Brault, the Gillard statement that he will not be a top 4 d-man on this team when clearly his play to date indicates that he will. Please keep scouting and reporting and I will keep auditing the good and the bad, so think before you type. And quit slapping yourself on the back with statements like it took me to go back to 2003 to dig up examples of you when your performance wasn't up to par, everyone knows that you are going to be wrong sometimes, so don't worry about that, just keep everything in perspective and keep up the good work its appreciated by us all. I dont have a problem with admiting when im wrong...unlike some folks. But please for the record state why you feel my opinion of Hannay differs from yours??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2009 14:43:50 GMT -4
We would need a team of auditors to audit certain members posts on here. We would need all of CRA to audit the shit I say on here. ;D
|
|
|
Post by fireball on Nov 19, 2009 17:22:46 GMT -4
moosefan, it it doesn't matter, we are not all experts of life on this board ! LOL Some people have strong opinions of certain topics on this board and like I said are not experts on evaluating hockey talent. I find some of their comments priceless. It goes both ways, some people like to antagonize, not me though ! CRA would die laughing at some peoples comments.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2009 19:49:41 GMT -4
moosefan, it it doesn't matter, we are not all experts of life on this board ! LOL Some people have strong opinions of certain topics on this board and like I said are not experts on evaluating hockey talent. I find some of their comments priceless. It goes both ways, some people like to antagonize, not me though ! CRA would die laughing at some peoples comments. Sure you don't like to antagonize people on here COUGH<< CHSB >>COUGH ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by fireball on Nov 19, 2009 21:26:26 GMT -4
Heh, moosefan, the game is on !1 LOl He is having a rough time now, chsb, I mean, so gotta take it easy on him !
|
|
|
Post by Smiley on Nov 19, 2009 23:44:02 GMT -4
Hey Lala, I appreciate your opinions as do most of the posters ON ALL BOARDS, you provide an insight from the scouting end thats very much appreciated by all. BUT you are not above being audited when you make statements that are far from being accurate such as the Hannay comparison to Brault, the Gillard statement that he will not be a top 4 d-man on this team when clearly his play to date indicates that he will. Please keep scouting and reporting and I will keep auditing the good and the bad, so think before you type. And quit slapping yourself on the back with statements like it took me to go back to 2003 to dig up examples of you when your performance wasn't up to par, everyone knows that you are going to be wrong sometimes, so don't worry about that, just keep everything in perspective and keep up the good work its appreciated by us all. While we're doing audits, I spent 2 mintues and found a couple of nice ones.... Good Call.... Cam will be Coach of the Year for the season 2007/08. Take it to the bank. Good Call.... Your obsession with everything Lalalaprise is anything but subtle. This got me thinking. Sharrow made some references to 2003, so he looked at the old Moosetalk board. So I looked at some of his posts there. Here are some other great posts by Sharrow (hoc05key). This was made Sept 12, 2006. That season 2006-2007 Halifax finished SIXTH in the division, a far cry from second. Made Sept 2nd 2006. Lewiston won the division by 12 points, and there were 29 points between 1st and 5th. Yea that is very close for the top 5 spots. This is about Kirk Forrest and was made Jan 29th 2006. He never turned out to be both a player for halifax. But this one wasn't as bad as this: You predicted that ASEEV would be a solid player? ASEEV, Solid? The worst Euro Halifax has ever had, the worst by far. Yet you predicted in training camp that he would be solid. See it's easy to go back and look at anyone's posts and find out where they were wrong. Lala has a much better track record than you do and I think I speak for most we appreciate his draft thoughts. What do you bring to the board during the draft period? Aseev a solid player, great insight.
|
|
|
Post by Fred The Moose on Nov 20, 2009 7:34:21 GMT -4
Boy Sharrow get out of this you are going down ,down.. Lalalaprise is too well liked here and we do want him to stay you can go hide in the trees for a few months..HA!HA!
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Nov 20, 2009 9:17:38 GMT -4
While we're doing audits, I spent 2 mintues and found a couple of nice ones.... Good Call.... Good Call.... Your obsession with everything Lalalaprise is anything but subtle. This got me thinking. Sharrow made some references to 2003, so he looked at the old Moosetalk board. So I looked at some of his posts there. Here are some other great posts by Sharrow (hoc05key). This was made Sept 12, 2006. That season 2006-2007 Halifax finished SIXTH in the division, a far cry from second. Made Sept 2nd 2006. Lewiston won the division by 12 points, and there were 29 points between 1st and 5th. Yea that is very close for the top 5 spots. This is about Kirk Forrest and was made Jan 29th 2006. He never turned out to be both a player for halifax. But this one wasn't as bad as this: You predicted that ASEEV would be a solid player? ASEEV, Solid? The worst Euro Halifax has ever had, the worst by far. Yet you predicted in training camp that he would be solid. See it's easy to go back and look at anyone's posts and find out where they were wrong. Lala has a much better track record than you do and I think I speak for most we appreciate his draft thoughts. What do you bring to the board during the draft period? Aseev a solid player, great insight. Ah yes ... holding somebody to their pre-season predictions of the standings ... that is exactly like evaluating a player that you get to watch play the game. What was wrong with the Forrest comment ... practicing to become a player and enforcer for next year ... working on his passing and skating ? Are you suggesting that was not the plan for Forrest ... they weren't working on his passing and skating ... they weren't hoping he could become more than just an enforcer ? I think Sharrow was correct on that comment. On Aseev .... he did look like a solid player ... or your team would have never drafted him ... same for Suchy and Chermetiev. Looking like a solid player and adapting to the Q, NA game, and the culture, language etc are two different things. I realize why you are "auditing" Sharrow ... but it is quite childish ... and a big waste of time no matter how quick you were able to do it. Do you think you proved an important point ? All you did was grab a few scraps and showed how petty you could be also.
|
|
|
Post by CrazyJoeDavola on Nov 20, 2009 10:41:16 GMT -4
This got me thinking. Sharrow made some references to 2003, so he looked at the old Moosetalk board. So I looked at some of his posts there. Here are some other great posts by Sharrow (hoc05key). This was made Sept 12, 2006. That season 2006-2007 Halifax finished SIXTH in the division, a far cry from second. Made Sept 2nd 2006. Lewiston won the division by 12 points, and there were 29 points between 1st and 5th. Yea that is very close for the top 5 spots. This is about Kirk Forrest and was made Jan 29th 2006. He never turned out to be both a player for halifax. But this one wasn't as bad as this: You predicted that ASEEV would be a solid player? ASEEV, Solid? The worst Euro Halifax has ever had, the worst by far. Yet you predicted in training camp that he would be solid. See it's easy to go back and look at anyone's posts and find out where they were wrong. Lala has a much better track record than you do and I think I speak for most we appreciate his draft thoughts. What do you bring to the board during the draft period? Aseev a solid player, great insight. I realize why you are "auditing" Sharrow ... I don't think you do. He is pointing out that sharrow has made player assessments early on that also turn out very wrong. The Forrest comment doesnt seem out of whack though. sharrow has been consistently dragging up old comments and laughing at them... if he wants to do that, then expect some of his will be too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2009 11:28:27 GMT -4
Sharrow kind of reminds me of Robert Deniro's character in the movie "The Fan" in his obsession with Lala; if Lala says something he agrees with then he'll love him, wish him happy birthday etc, but if Lala is wrong ( in Sharrow's mind anyways), he'll turn on him in a second.
Sharrow has been getting worse since the season started and needed to be called out- it is simple as that.
|
|