|
|
Post by WhiteTyAffair on Jun 6, 2020 9:19:40 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jun 6, 2020 9:28:42 GMT -4
|
|
LLL
Rookie
Posts: 210
|
Post by LLL on Jun 6, 2020 9:36:20 GMT -4
I hope is weight listing is ancient history.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jun 6, 2020 9:37:42 GMT -4
I hope is weight listing is ancient history. 6'1" 175lbs is not small for a 16 year old. Just turned 16. |
|
|
|
Post by pong on Jun 6, 2020 9:38:32 GMT -4
I can see DeJong having more value to us than in a trade. I think he will be a very good OA d-man - potentially one of the better ones in the league ... but I can see if other teams are not quite sold on that value. He really broke through last year, but playing behind Spence, Andersson, and MacIsaac, not sure if the rest of the league would fully value it. I was told that Dejong's trade value is "quite a bit higher than you think" so in that case I would move him right away. By the same token you open up another spot for guys like Dow Wilson Pavan Pilotte plus maybe Nutbrown. Plus Hudson up front as an OA instead of losing him for nothing. I’m with Jimmy on this unless there’s a serious overpayment for DeJong. I’m a big fan of Tristan, and the progression in his game. You need some veterans to show the way to the youngsters and I think DeJong and Hudson should be option #1 and #2 as the 20’s. Lund Cornish is very much on the bubble for me |
|
LLL
Rookie
Posts: 210
|
Post by LLL on Jun 6, 2020 9:41:01 GMT -4
I hope is weight listing is ancient history. 6'1" 175lbs is not small for a 16 year old. Just turned 16. My bad. I was looking at the Q site draft screen and he is shown at 5'9" 130 lbs. 6'1" and 175 lbs sounds better. |
|
|
|
Post by WhiteTyAffair on Jun 6, 2020 9:41:35 GMT -4
Not this season. He compares himself to Ryan Suter. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jun 6, 2020 9:41:54 GMT -4
I was told that Dejong's trade value is "quite a bit higher than you think" so in that case I would move him right away. By the same token you open up another spot for guys like Dow Wilson Pavan Pilotte plus maybe Nutbrown. Plus Hudson up front as an OA instead of losing him for nothing. I’m with Jimmy on this unless there’s a serious overpayment for DeJong. I’m a big fan of Tristan, and the progression in his game. You need some veterans to show the way to the youngsters and I think DeJong and Hudson should be option #1 and #2 as the 20’s. Lund Cornish is very much on the bubble for me Leonard is bigger and stronger than Hudson, plays the same style and has shown a bit more offense. OA depth... 1-DeJong 2-Leonard 3-Cornish 4-Hudson 5-MacLellan |
|
|
|
Post by jimmy on Jun 6, 2020 9:45:48 GMT -4
I’m with Jimmy on this unless there’s a serious overpayment for DeJong. I’m a big fan of Tristan, and the progression in his game. You need some veterans to show the way to the youngsters and I think DeJong and Hudson should be option #1 and #2 as the 20’s. Lund Cornish is very much on the bubble for me Leonard is bigger and stronger than Hudson, plays the same style and has shown a bit more offense. OA depth... 1-DeJong 2-Leonard 3-Cornish 4-Hudson 5-MacLellan Leonard did't show much this season to me ... not sure what happened, he was better at 18. He would be #4 for me behind DeJong, Hudson and Cornish ... |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jun 6, 2020 10:18:02 GMT -4
Leonard is bigger and stronger than Hudson, plays the same style and has shown a bit more offense. OA depth... 1-DeJong 2-Leonard 3-Cornish 4-Hudson 5-MacLellan Leonard did't show much this season to me ... not sure what happened, he was better at 18. He would be #4 for me behind DeJong, Hudson and Cornish ... When they added Leonard he was used exclusively as a 4th liner. Hudson got chances in the top 6 in the 1st half and was not noticeable. I find Leonard brings more energy. If you play him top 6 he will make an impact and chip in 35-40pts. |
|
|
|
Post by WhiteTyAffair on Jun 6, 2020 10:18:14 GMT -4
Pick 41 - Jake Rozzi
A pure goal scorer. A "game changer" as chsb would say. His skating could use some work, but he's fast once he gets going.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jun 6, 2020 10:21:11 GMT -4
Pick 41 - Jake Rozzi A pure goal scorer. A "game changer" as chsb would say. His skating could use some work, but he's fast once he gets going. Sounds like Mckenna at 15. |
|
|
|
Post by scotiahockey on Jun 6, 2020 10:31:16 GMT -4
Pick 41 - Jake Rozzi A pure goal scorer. A "game changer" as chsb would say. His skating could use some work, but he's fast once he gets going. Sounds like Mckenna at 15. I think he’s a really good player. Great value in the 3rd round, not sure if he’s committed to the Q route but if he is, I think you got a dandy. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jun 6, 2020 10:36:09 GMT -4
Sounds like Mckenna at 15. I think he’s a really good player. Great value in the 3rd round, not sure if he’s committed to the Q route but if he is, I think you got a dandy. All 3 Cats players were playing outside of their MAAA, hopefully they are all coming. |
|
|
|
Post by scotiahockey on Jun 6, 2020 10:39:38 GMT -4
I think he’s a really good player. Great value in the 3rd round, not sure if he’s committed to the Q route but if he is, I think you got a dandy. All 3 Cats players were playing outside of their MAAA, hopefully they are all coming. I’m a lot more confident in Loshing and Hopkins coming then I am Rozzi... Stanstead does have a way of getting guys to stick around though so who really knows what Hopkins plans are. I like to think that if the Wildcats with so few picks are taking them at 23 and 41 though that they have some sort of commitment? |
|
