|
|
Post by seadogs10 on Mar 24, 2020 13:52:52 GMT -4
Below is what I have of potential returning players for next year along with their age (let me know of any that are wrong). Use this thread to make line combo's, trade targets, rumoured trades, etc.
Forwards:
Anderson MacDonald (20)
Matt Gould (20)
Ben Badalamenti (20)
Julian Vander Voet (19)
Maxim Cajkovic (19)
Brady Burns (18)
Alex Drover (18)
Josh Lawrence (18)
Dawson Stairs (18)
Alexandre O'Neill (18)
Joshua Roy (17)
Charles Savoie (17)
Defense:
Jordan Spadafore (20)
Brendan Sibley (19)
William Villeneuve (18)
Jeremie Poirier (18)
Charlie DeRoches (18)
Joona Lehmus (18)
Kale McCallum (18)
Goalies:
Mathais Savoie (18)
Noah Patenaude (18)
Top Prospects:
Jack Williams (18)
Peter Reynolds (17)
Cam MadDonald (17)
Robert Orr (17)
Anthony Cliche (17)
Anthony Cafarelli (17)
Draft Picks:
2020: 1BC-1DRUM-2RIM-3GAT-6CHA-7-9-11-13-14
2021: 1-1HFX-2-2SHE-4SHE-6RIM-6VIC-7-9-10-11-13-14
2020: 1-1RIM-2-3-3GAT-6-7- 8-9-10-10MON-10GAT-11-12-13-14
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Mar 24, 2020 14:26:08 GMT -4
Patenaude will be 18.
|
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Mar 24, 2020 15:52:30 GMT -4
Assuming MacDonald keeps his act together and that the 2 Americans are able to get back into the country (the season likely doesn't start if the border is still closed), I don't think there is any question that Spadafore will be the odd man out for the 20 year old situation. Especially if the rumors about Inniss are correct, which my understanding is it's pretty much confirmed.
I'm still not 100% sold on those 3 being our 20s but out of the 4 on the current roster, those would be my 3.
I really didn't think Vander Voet would be back next season and I'm still leaning that way, but him being one of the nominees for team player has me thinking that he might get more consideration than I thought.
I believe Inniss will be captain. If Gould is back, he'll keep an "A". I'd really like to see Desroches get an "A". The 3rd might goto 1 of the other 20s.
From the prospects, I think Reynolds reports. We'll be lucky if any others do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Mar 25, 2020 9:58:40 GMT -4
Imo, if Reynolds reports, we do not have places for 3 oa.
On D, we could either get Cliche to commit, use a 1st on a D (or both Cliche and a pick), or add a top end oa.
In nets, we will have to decide whether we want to run with an 18 yo g.
If we do one of the above, then I hope we call and get a price on Element.
|
|
|
|
Post by tim08 on Mar 28, 2020 10:23:09 GMT -4
The French board is saying the first in 2022 going back for innis. NO way Trevor makes that trade I say the 3rd goes back if you break the trade down by player.
|
|
|
|
Post by tim08 on Mar 28, 2020 10:32:43 GMT -4
Guay=1st+2nd durocher=2nd or 3rd innis=1st+2nd or 1st+3rd all works out NO 1sts going back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Mar 28, 2020 10:49:48 GMT -4
Guay=1st+2nd durocher=2nd or 3rd innis=1st+2nd or 1st+3rd all works out NO 1sts going back. Guay doesn't get a 1st and a 2nd. |
|
|
|
Post by tim08 on Mar 28, 2020 10:55:30 GMT -4
Why not bibeau got 2 1sts
|
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Mar 28, 2020 11:48:40 GMT -4
Why not bibeau got 2 1sts No, he got a backup goalie, a 2nd and Rochette |
|
gdg25
Blue-Chip Prospect
Posts: 349
|
Post by gdg25 on Mar 28, 2020 14:26:29 GMT -4
Guay=1st+2nd durocher=2nd or 3rd innis=1st+2nd or 1st+3rd all works out NO 1sts going back. We’ll what’s the going rate for a 19 year old top 2 shutdown D? |
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Mar 28, 2020 16:32:56 GMT -4
Durocher wasn't much of a downgrade from Guay. Another 1st for Inniss seems reasonable.
He's likely to be back as a 20 the following season and since we're so weak with 2001 born players, he doesn't bump anyone else out of a 20 spot.
|
|
|
|
Post by statsman18 on Mar 30, 2020 9:25:53 GMT -4
Imo, if Reynolds reports, we do not have places for 3 oa. On D, we could either get Cliche to commit, use a 1st on a D (or both Cliche and a pick), or add a top end oa. In nets, we will have to decide whether we want to run with an 18 yo g. If we do one of the above, then I hope we call and get a price on Element. This is just my personal opinion and my out look but if I’m Reynolds father I’m telling him he’s not going NCAA to play. I know that’s still two years away and a lot can change, but everything that has happened in the past 3 weeks alone I personally wouldn’t want my teenager in a different country. I would be very happy with the CHL schooling money for now. That was very long winded way of saying if there is a silver lining to this Covid-19 it could be this. IMO I think the chances of him reporting have grown. |
|
|
|
Post by scotiahockey on Mar 30, 2020 10:24:25 GMT -4
Imo, if Reynolds reports, we do not have places for 3 oa. On D, we could either get Cliche to commit, use a 1st on a D (or both Cliche and a pick), or add a top end oa. In nets, we will have to decide whether we want to run with an 18 yo g. If we do one of the above, then I hope we call and get a price on Element. This is just my personal opinion and my out look but if I’m Reynolds father I’m telling him he’s not going NCAA to play. I know that’s still two years away and a lot can change, but everything that has happened in the past 3 weeks alone I personally wouldn’t want my teenager in a different country. I would be very happy with the CHL schooling money for now. That was very long winded way of saying if there is a silver lining to this Covid-19 it could be this. IMO I think the chances of him reporting have grown. While it’s great to tell your son they aren’t going to play NCAA, the fact of the matter is, it really isn’t the parents choice. I know when I was 17/18 my parents weren’t telling me where I could play hockey and what school I would be attending, it was totally my choice. I know for a lot of players making hockey choices (at the Jr. A/Q level) while their parents have an input they don’t have the ultimate say in the matter. The players are the ones who make the choice, obviously the parents have input and they talk everything over but they’re not ruling with an iron fist and telling them they can’t go play here or there. He can still stay on the same path he is for next season and then make his decision the year after and be in the same place. The Q will always be there for him, I think if you’ve stayed the course this long then odds are you may want to just wait it out and see. I don’t know that he’s going to come into the Q next season and light the world on fire, he very much strikes me as a guy that’s better to stay the NCAA route and allow a team to make a decision on him when he’s 20/21 instead of having to decide whether to sign him at 19. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Mar 30, 2020 10:39:00 GMT -4
This is just my personal opinion and my out look but if I’m Reynolds father I’m telling him he’s not going NCAA to play. I know that’s still two years away and a lot can change, but everything that has happened in the past 3 weeks alone I personally wouldn’t want my teenager in a different country. I would be very happy with the CHL schooling money for now. That was very long winded way of saying if there is a silver lining to this Covid-19 it could be this. IMO I think the chances of him reporting have grown. While it’s great to tell your son they aren’t going to play NCAA, the fact of the matter is, it really isn’t the parents choice. I know when I was 17/18 my parents weren’t telling me where I could play hockey and what school I would be attending, it was totally my choice. I know for a lot of players making hockey choices (at the Jr. A/Q level) while their parents have an input they don’t have the ultimate say in the matter. The players are the ones who make the choice, obviously the parents have input and they talk everything over but they’re not ruling with an iron fist and telling them they can’t go play here or there. He can still stay on the same path he is for next season and then make his decision the year after and be in the same place. The Q will always be there for him, I think if you’ve stayed the course this long then odds are you may want to just wait it out and see. I don’t know that he’s going to come into the Q next season and light the world on fire, he very much strikes me as a guy that’s better to stay the NCAA route and allow a team to make a decision on him when he’s 20/21 instead of having to decide whether to sign him at 19. I think you are underestimating Reynolds. He would likely be our 1c. |
|
|
|
Post by statsman18 on Mar 30, 2020 11:08:56 GMT -4
This is just my personal opinion and my out look but if I’m Reynolds father I’m telling him he’s not going NCAA to play. I know that’s still two years away and a lot can change, but everything that has happened in the past 3 weeks alone I personally wouldn’t want my teenager in a different country. I would be very happy with the CHL schooling money for now. That was very long winded way of saying if there is a silver lining to this Covid-19 it could be this. IMO I think the chances of him reporting have grown. While it’s great to tell your son they aren’t going to play NCAA, the fact of the matter is, it really isn’t the parents choice. I know when I was 17/18 my parents weren’t telling me where I could play hockey and what school I would be attending, it was totally my choice. I know for a lot of players making hockey choices (at the Jr. A/Q level) while their parents have an input they don’t have the ultimate say in the matter. The players are the ones who make the choice, obviously the parents have input and they talk everything over but they’re not ruling with an iron fist and telling them they can’t go play here or there. He can still stay on the same path he is for next season and then make his decision the year after and be in the same place. The Q will always be there for him, I think if you’ve stayed the course this long then odds are you may want to just wait it out and see. I don’t know that he’s going to come into the Q next season and light the world on fire, he very much strikes me as a guy that’s better to stay the NCAA route and allow a team to make a decision on him when he’s 20/21 instead of having to decide whether to sign him at 19. Okay I get what your saying but here’s the thing your missing, there was no Global pandemic when you were that age. Times have changed and it isn’t going to be the normal that we grew up with for some time. No offence a and correct me if I’m wrong here but your post tells me your not a parent. When and if you become one you will look at these things very differently. Now admittedly my kids are very young and I won’t have to tell my sons anything like this for many years. But being a parent and helping my teenage son make these decisions in to days climate yes 100% me and his Mother( the boss) would be telling him you need to stay in Canada. Trust me many other parents would think this way. I have to add by no ways I’m I trying to be disrespectful here by being personal at all. I will also add if it were 2 months ago I would be on your side and saying thing like it’s his decision but things have changed Drastically. |
|
