|
Post by Edguy on Dec 21, 2021 11:27:21 GMT -4
I definitely really like the add. Just really interested to see what he does up front. So far he's started with 2 areas I didn't think were real issues for us.
|
|
|
Post by Score on Dec 21, 2021 11:32:27 GMT -4
I definitely really like the add. Just really interested to see what he does up front. So far he's started with 2 areas I didn't think were real issues for us. I see them adding a 2nd line fw......but goal scoring hasn't been a huge issue......they are league leaders in goals scored with 130.....and are sitting 4th overall in goals against. But yes. I do see them adding to the forward group.....just not a HUGE name.
|
|
|
Post by switchback on Dec 21, 2021 11:41:04 GMT -4
This is a good move but a puzzling move we need a top 6 to put us over the hump I’m sure he will add one just not sure how.
|
|
|
Post by jordo999 on Dec 21, 2021 11:44:24 GMT -4
the only thing is though the forward group is being carried by the 1st 2 lines...gotta add that depth scoring especially in the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by bois on Dec 21, 2021 11:50:17 GMT -4
Hulton loves building from the backend there is no question we are defensively loaded.... maybe the top 2 lines is enough to put us over the top and really just add a couple smaller vet peices to round out the bottom 6? this is not the way I expected the trade period to start but as always Hulton surprises i love this addition and although I still think the Lapenna trade was perhaps unnecessary i'm not gonna second guess the man..... Briwhel why do we owe Chicoutimi a future?
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 21, 2021 11:51:28 GMT -4
Hulton loves building from the backend there is no question we are defensively loaded.... maybe the top 2 lines is enough to put us over the top and really just add a couple smaller vet peices to round out the bottom 6? this is not the way I expected the trade period to start but as always Hulton surprises i love this addition and although I still think the Lapenna trade was perhaps unnecessary i'm not gonna second guess the man..... Briwhel why do we owe Chicoutimi a future? There's been a lot of speculation on the French board that you will get some picks (if not all of the 3-4-5) back in exchange for a future on the Simoneau deal.
|
|
|
Post by bois on Dec 21, 2021 11:52:29 GMT -4
Still lots of futures to be had. Plandowski, Guay and Trudeau would all fetch a good haul as futures. You can't trade futures if you don't have any picks to link them to At this point, the highest pick you own is a 3rd (which may not be good enough to link). Also, you owe Chicoutimi a future already. you can trade futures for sure..... have you just started following this league? who do we owe chicoutimi a future for? i don't really like to link names here so i won't but we do have a prospect who was drafted fairly high that i expect to be moved in a deal to add a forward... with the league now postponing games til the 7th tho there isn't so much a rush to get it done
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 21, 2021 11:55:43 GMT -4
The kid will definitely get you a top 6 fw by himself.
|
|
|
Post by bois on Dec 21, 2021 11:57:39 GMT -4
why don't you answer my question?
who do we owe Chicoutimi a future for?
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 21, 2021 11:59:15 GMT -4
why don't you answer my question? who do we owe Chicoutimi a future for? I did answer above. There is a lot of speculation that you owe a future for Simoneau.
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Dec 21, 2021 11:59:20 GMT -4
Hulton loves building from the backend there is no question we are defensively loaded.... maybe the top 2 lines is enough to put us over the top and really just add a couple smaller vet peices to round out the bottom 6? this is not the way I expected the trade period to start but as always Hulton surprises i love this addition and although I still think the Lapenna trade was perhaps unnecessary i'm not gonna second guess the man..... Briwhel why do we owe Chicoutimi a future? There's been a lot of speculation on the French board that you will get some picks (if not all of the 3-4-5) back in exchange for a future on the Simoneau deal. I think they already got the 3-4-5 back already. Simoneau cost 2 1sts
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 21, 2021 12:00:58 GMT -4
There's been a lot of speculation on the French board that you will get some picks (if not all of the 3-4-5) back in exchange for a future on the Simoneau deal. I think they already got the 3-4-5 back already. Simoneau cost 2 1sts You are correct, but it doesn't change the fact that they might get that back for a future.
|
|
|
Post by Edguy on Dec 21, 2021 12:08:13 GMT -4
why don't you answer my question? who do we owe Chicoutimi a future for? I did answer above. There is a lot of speculation that you owe a future for Simoneau. Is Sam Oliver that future? Seems like in the article below it's articulated as this is a continuation of the Simmoneau deal. "Which follows on from" makes it seem this way at least
|
|
|
Post by bois on Dec 21, 2021 12:12:10 GMT -4
why don't you answer my question? who do we owe Chicoutimi a future for? I did answer above. There is a lot of speculation that you owe a future for Simoneau. Simoneau didn't come from Chicoutimi we havent made a trade with them in several years i don't believe you said we owe Chicoutimi a future i'm asking you why you seem to think that
|
|
|
Post by switchback on Dec 21, 2021 12:14:48 GMT -4
You can't trade futures if you don't have any picks to link them to At this point, the highest pick you own is a 3rd (which may not be good enough to link). Also, you owe Chicoutimi a future already. you can trade futures for sure..... have you just started following this league? who do we owe chicoutimi a future for? i don't really like to link names here so i won't but we do have a prospect who was drafted fairly high that i expect to be moved in a deal to add a forward... with the league now postponing games til the 7th tho there isn't so much a rush to get it done Drafted high in the Q?
|
|