|
Post by qfan on Oct 21, 2008 12:55:02 GMT -4
My impression is that Moncton should win with a margin or three. I say 4-1.
I was wondering who might be out of the line up?
|
|
|
Post by CatsFan on Oct 21, 2008 13:40:41 GMT -4
My impression is that Moncton should win with a margin or three. I say 4-1. I was wondering who might be out of the line up? Someone else starting the game threads! I'll go with a 3-2 Cats win. Riopel in nets. As for who is out of the lineup, it all depends on the status of Brannon.. anyone know what that might be?
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Oct 21, 2008 18:11:01 GMT -4
5-1 Cats...
Riopel in Nets...
Lane & Roski scratches up front...
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Afanasenkov on Oct 21, 2008 20:18:53 GMT -4
We're going to lose in regulation - 4-1.
We're due for a loss and we've been getting outshot... badly by BC... only our defensive play has saved us.
I think we're due to lay an egg.
|
|
|
Post by joepuck on Oct 21, 2008 20:29:48 GMT -4
what will the line combinations be tomorrow night?
|
|
|
Post by sec21critic on Oct 21, 2008 20:33:46 GMT -4
We're going to lose in regulation - 4-1. We're due for a loss and we've been getting outshot... badly by BC... only our defensive play has saved us. I think we're due to lay an egg. I think we've already layed at least four eggs already this year... we just snuck away with either wins or OT losses.
|
|
|
Post by hockey1981 on Oct 21, 2008 20:51:43 GMT -4
what will the line combinations be tomorrow night? Brown - Cameron - Eagles MacAusland - Stephens - Lahey Lessard - Sill - Brannon Famin - Bissonnette - Pettersson
|
|
|
Post by joepuck on Oct 21, 2008 21:49:16 GMT -4
not sure about Macausland and Lahey on the second line though?
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Afanasenkov on Oct 22, 2008 7:38:16 GMT -4
We're going to lose in regulation - 4-1. We're due for a loss and we've been getting outshot... badly by BC... only our defensive play has saved us. I think we're due to lay an egg. I think we've already layed at least four eggs already this year... we just snuck away with either wins or OT losses. Let me rephrase my last sentence then... I think we're due to lay an egg that we can't recover from.
|
|
|
Post by qfan on Oct 22, 2008 21:14:30 GMT -4
Wow running the goalie and nothing happens. These rules really sucks!!! That would never have happend last year with Lane in the line up!
Another thing to look at would be attendance.... 3300 for Moncton is not a good number specially with the start they're having.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Oct 22, 2008 21:18:54 GMT -4
Wow running the goalie and nothing happens. These rules really sucks!!! That would never have happend last year with Lane in the line up! Another thing to look at would be attendance.... 3300 for Moncton is not a good number specially with the start they're having. 3,300 on a Wednesday night is pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by sec21critic on Oct 22, 2008 21:20:17 GMT -4
Wow running the goalie and nothing happens. These rules really sucks!!! That would never have happend last year with Lane in the line up! Another thing to look at would be attendance.... 3300 for Moncton is not a good number specially with the start they're having. 3300 has been the status quo around here for weeknight games in October for the better part of a decade (Mem Cup year bring the exception).
|
|
|
Post by Dalkiel on Oct 22, 2008 21:28:13 GMT -4
I really don't like how if a coach points upstairs then the ref automaticaly goes upstairs. I sat right behind Martel tonight and with that scrum in the 3rd when they went upstairs there is nothing that I saw from his angle that would even hint of a goal. My suggestion would be something on the lines of if a coach wants to challenge it then fine, if he is right then nothing but if he is incorrect on his challenge then a penalty. Patty Roy did that on a regular basis a few years ago and I thought something would have been done then.
|
|
|
Post by Dalkiel on Oct 22, 2008 21:29:42 GMT -4
Wow running the goalie and nothing happens. These rules really sucks!!! That would never have happend last year with Lane in the line up! Another thing to look at would be attendance.... 3300 for Moncton is not a good number specially with the start they're having. Aparently if a goalie is juggling the puck your allowed to take 3 really good sticks hard against his chest too
|
|
|
Post by joepuck on Oct 22, 2008 23:27:53 GMT -4
what i find a little disappointing is the amount of ice time BISSONNETTE is getting, he is a 16 yr old like GORMLEY, you need to play him for him to develop, sitting him will only hurt his confidence, in my opinion he is our best guy on the power play that can handle the puck, he needs to play with a couple of good players so he can develop like GORMLEY playing with BARBERIO, same goes for DOMINGUE he needs to play to develop! these guys will bring you the mem cup!!!
|
|