|
Trade
Dec 17, 2007 19:23:00 GMT -4
Post by rockon on Dec 17, 2007 19:23:00 GMT -4
Perhaps you guys should be giving a little more credit to Savard? Savard should be given credit for acquiring Gelinas and people have done that. I've even said in another post that it was a good pick up and that someone did their homework when they were scouting him. If you had taken the same amount of time that it took to dig out a post that I had made almost 4 months ago, and try to find examples of people giving credit, you would have realized that people do give credit where credit is due. Yes a good pickup, whoever was scouting him for the Rocket did their homework on him. Actually it didn't take any time at all and my whole point was they some of you guys are quick to "shit" on certain individuals, but not so quick on compliments!
|
|
|
Trade
Dec 17, 2007 22:36:41 GMT -4
Post by wingman on Dec 17, 2007 22:36:41 GMT -4
Not sure why Savard would make a trade for a goalie that has hardly played in the league. If it was someone with experience one could guess that Gelinas is being brought in to backup Lafleur because management didn't think Mosher could do the job. But with so little experience, perhaps Savard is looking for him to be the 3rd string goalie. Perhaps you guys should be giving a little more credit to Savard? Actually it didn't take any time at all and my whole point was they some of you guys are quick to "shit" on certain individuals, but not so quick on compliments! What part of that post was I shitting on someone? I was just speculating why Savard would be acquiring another goalie at the time, reasons which Krang had already explained to you earlier today. Did I say it was a bad move on Savard's part? No. Did I say that Savard shouldn't have made that trade? No. Did I say anything negative about anybody in that post. No. Did I say anything negative about the trade? No. So I don't know where you get the idea that I was shitting on someone as I was just discussing/guessing the possibilities as to why that trade was made. Isn't this is a message board where people do discuss topics and give their opinions on hockey? If anyone was "quick to "shit" on certain individuals", it was you by trying to use a poor example of someone being critical when in fact they weren't even being negative or critical at all.
|
|
|
Trade
Dec 18, 2007 9:46:50 GMT -4
Post by rockon on Dec 18, 2007 9:46:50 GMT -4
Perhaps you guys should be giving a little more credit to Savard? Actually it didn't take any time at all and my whole point was they some of you guys are quick to "shit" on certain individuals, but not so quick on compliments! What part of that post was I shitting on someone? I was just speculating why Savard would be acquiring another goalie at the time, reasons which Krang had already explained to you earlier today. Did I say it was a bad move on Savard's part? No. Did I say that Savard shouldn't have made that trade? No. Did I say anything negative about anybody in that post. No. Did I say anything negative about the trade? No. So I don't know where you get the idea that I was shitting on someone as I was just discussing/guessing the possibilities as to why that trade was made. Isn't this is a message board where people do discuss topics and give their opinions on hockey? If anyone was "quick to "shit" on certain individuals", it was you by trying to use a poor example of someone being critical when in fact they weren't even being negative or critical at all. I wasn't referring to you or this thread specifically, I just happened to notice how much positive attention Gelinas was getting(and rightly so) and how resistant some people are to anything positive towards Rocket management. I was speaking in general terms and not at specific people or posts.
|
|
|
Trade
Dec 18, 2007 12:13:45 GMT -4
Post by mboyan on Dec 18, 2007 12:13:45 GMT -4
Savard should be given credit for acquiring Gelinas and people have done that. I've even said in another post that it was a good pick up and that someone did their homework when they were scouting him. If you had taken the same amount of time that it took to dig out a post that I had made almost 4 months ago, and try to find examples of people giving credit, you would have realized that people do give credit where credit is due. Actually it didn't take any time at all and my whole point was they some of you guys are quick to "shit" on certain individuals, but not so quick on compliments! So....would that be "shit" disturbing then?
|
|
|
Trade
Dec 18, 2007 14:18:00 GMT -4
Post by rockon on Dec 18, 2007 14:18:00 GMT -4
as per reggiedunlop7's POST: Some seem to have made it their mission it seems to tear down anything this club does regardless of any gesture by the team to do right.
|
|
|
Trade
Dec 18, 2007 14:22:51 GMT -4
Post by Score on Dec 18, 2007 14:22:51 GMT -4
as per reggiedunlop7's POST: Some seem to have made it their mission it seems to tear down anything this club does regardless of any gesture by the team to do right. Some perhaps...but definitly not all. and sometimes the truth hurts a bit too I guess. You seem to be making this a misson of some sort.....
|
|
|
Trade
Dec 18, 2007 15:51:07 GMT -4
Post by rockon on Dec 18, 2007 15:51:07 GMT -4
as per reggiedunlop7's POST: Some seem to have made it their mission it seems to tear down anything this club does regardless of any gesture by the team to do right. Some perhaps...but definitly not all. and sometimes the truth hurts a bit too I guess. You seem to be making this a misson of some sort..... Probably because "some" and I've never used the term "all", tend to read a posting and reply to it without any comprehension of the point being made!
|
|