|
|
Post by lewis94 on Jun 6, 2022 9:08:17 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by Score on Jun 6, 2022 10:18:25 GMT -4
16-5 shots in favor of the Isles... Like mentioned above, they need to stay out of the box and get a bounce here and there. The goal was called back why? The replays on Eastlink didn't show any goaltender interference... On the chl feed they speculated brabanec accidentally made contact with lavalee From all the angles showed on Eastlink, Brabenec did not touch the goaltender....even the announcers said so... |
|
|
|
Post by Fiveholesniper on Jun 6, 2022 10:19:40 GMT -4
any chance you can give a readers digest English version? |
|
|
|
Post by ysj28 on Jun 6, 2022 10:30:16 GMT -4
any chance you can give a readers digest English version? It basically describes the play and then has comments from Simoneau who said he only makes $60 a week and it's the first time since he's been playing hockey that he's seen something called like that. Hulton then goes on to say that he has to choose his words carefully and then goes on to say that he has never seen the rule interpreted that way before and that it might in fact be a penalty but at that time of game it wasn't the time to call it. |
|
|
|
Post by Score on Jun 6, 2022 10:37:24 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by Naomi on Jun 6, 2022 11:43:15 GMT -4
Not sure if anyone posted the video of the penalty, but yeah, finals are not the time to call that.
|
|
|
|
Post by bois on Jun 6, 2022 11:43:18 GMT -4
somebody please bring up the clip Cory posted on twitter of Hicks smokin a cigar with his #58 cap on backwards tellin whoever he's being interviewed by that he don't care who wins a hockey game.... lol
|
|
|
|
Post by bois on Jun 6, 2022 11:46:07 GMT -4
On the chl feed they speculated brabanec accidentally made contact with lavalee From all the angles showed on Eastlink, Brabenec did not touch the goaltender....even the announcers said so... i said thats what they speculated i didn't see any contact either in the replay but his head did snap back so might have been some incidental... |
|
|
|
Post by Naomi on Jun 6, 2022 12:18:43 GMT -4
somebody please bring up the clip Cory posted on twitter of Hicks smokin a cigar with his #58 cap on backwards tellin whoever he's being interviewed by that he don't care who wins a hockey game.... lol I think we need to come up with a stronger word than douchebag for this clown. |
|
|
|
Post by countryboy on Jun 6, 2022 12:18:50 GMT -4
I thought the called back goal was due to it being directed in with a high stick.
There was no announcement after the video review other than "no goal".
|
|
|
|
Post by Naomi on Jun 6, 2022 12:26:42 GMT -4
I thought the called back goal was due to it being directed in with a high stick. There was no announcement after the video review other than "no goal". I wish they'd change that. It takes no effort for them to say "the play is under review for [insert reason here]". |
|
|
|
Post by lirette on Jun 6, 2022 12:31:34 GMT -4
somebody please bring up the clip Cory posted on twitter of Hicks smokin a cigar with his #58 cap on backwards tellin whoever he's being interviewed by that he don't care who wins a hockey game.... lol There is a lot of gems on that podcast, worth a listen. He retells the story of the imama / bent incident. |
|
|
|
Post by Naomi on Jun 6, 2022 12:50:21 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by ysj28 on Jun 6, 2022 12:57:08 GMT -4
There we have it. Black and white play as I suspected. And Jay Doiron caught it as well. Time to move on to Game 3. |
|
|
|
Post by sc74 on Jun 6, 2022 13:22:29 GMT -4
The problem isn’t about calling the black and white penalty, it’s more about not calling the others all 3rd period and then impacting a game with a minute left when you have to call the black and white penalty.
Bourque hitting an Islander in the numbers near the board is also a black and white penalty but it wasn’t called. And there were some both sides.
|
|
