|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Mar 24, 2010 13:26:43 GMT -4
I wonder what the lines will be like tonight? I think that was the first time this year Adam, Lagace, MacNeil were together? Adam and Nick created some chances but Lagace? I hope Adam is put back with Horyl and Hertz. Maybe try Lagace in section 26...lol. I keep waiting and waiting for him to produce, it just amazes me what went wrong with him. We don't have set lines. We dress 12 forwards, staple Bernard's ass to the bench, use Shaw and Bourgeois in spot duty and just throw random combo's of centers and wingers together and hope for the best. That's pretty much what I witnessed last night. Bourgois, Horyl, Cuzner played once or twice and I liked what they did but it's really no wonder there's so many questions and issues when guys literally have no idea who they're going to be on the ice with next time they get a shift. |
|
|
|
Post by gongshow on Mar 24, 2010 13:37:24 GMT -4
I'm surprised nobody mentioned that call. I caught it right away and even had to tell the people around me what the penalty was for. We ended the period down a man. At the start of the 2nd when the players came back from intermission we sent 5 players on the ice with Roy.....someone either on the ice or on our bench noticed because the guy closest to the bench flew off the ice....but the damage was done, Moncton's entire bench had both refs all over it. But they didn't announce too many men, all they said was bench minor at 20:00 of the first. Oh, and we didn't even play a 3rd D pairing. Woodworth had 1 shift in the second and Fournier was spotted in here and there. Other then that it was the top 4....none of which are more then a #2 at best. I didn't know they could call a too many men unless the puck was dropped Yeah I didn't think the 3rd pairing played much but I thought I seen them more then 1-2 shifts....either way it's a scary thought.Moncton does the same thing except their top4 is actually a good top4 lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Bauer on Mar 24, 2010 13:45:14 GMT -4
I'm surprised nobody mentioned that call. I caught it right away and even had to tell the people around me what the penalty was for. We ended the period down a man. At the start of the 2nd when the players came back from intermission we sent 5 players on the ice with Roy.....someone either on the ice or on our bench noticed because the guy closest to the bench flew off the ice....but the damage was done, Moncton's entire bench had both refs all over it. But they didn't announce too many men, all they said was bench minor at 20:00 of the first. Oh, and we didn't even play a 3rd D pairing. Woodworth had 1 shift in the second and Fournier was spotted in here and there. Other then that it was the top 4....none of which are more then a #2 at best. I didn't know they could call a too many men unless the puck was dropped Yeah I didn't think the 3rd pairing played much but I thought I seen them more then 1-2 shifts....either way it's a scary thought.Moncton does the same thing except their top4 is actually a good top4 lol. Yeah, it's too bad me, you, and 99% of the other posters here knew Savard/Gormley/Barberio were better then anything we have to offer on the blueline yet our President, GM, Asst GM, and head scout thought they had a team to beat and could subtract from their blueline without adding to it. Funny thing is for the most part in sports we fans criticize management yet could do no better.....but I bet there's many posters here on these boards who could absolutely do a better job running a Q team then what we've been subjected to here over the last 16 months. |
|
|
|
Post by dt281 on Mar 24, 2010 14:34:20 GMT -4
Did Monctons D give up any odd man rushes last night?
I know they gave up 48 shots, but I still found they limited our second chances and I think the decent shots were only 13.
|
|
|
|
Post by gongshow on Mar 24, 2010 14:58:33 GMT -4
I didn't know they could call a too many men unless the puck was dropped Yeah I didn't think the 3rd pairing played much but I thought I seen them more then 1-2 shifts....either way it's a scary thought.Moncton does the same thing except their top4 is actually a good top4 lol. Yeah, it's too bad me, you, and 99% of the other posters here knew Savard/Gormley/Barberio were better then anything we have to offer on the blueline yet our President, GM, Asst GM, and head scout thought they had a team to beat and could subtract from their blueline without adding to it. Funny thing is for the most part in sports we fans criticize management yet could do no better.....but I bet there's many posters here on these boards who could absolutely do a better job running a Q team then what we've been subjected to here over the last 16 months. Oh I know everybody and their dog knew it was a bad move to load up.....I know you mentionned it would've been better to keep Gelinas then to add Lagace and I agreed then and still agree now.At least with Gelinas you would have one of the most valuable chips at next years deadline plus whatever he brought from now till then. I guess that's what happens when you have a BOG instead of private ownership  .And that's not just in hockey. |
|
|
|
Post by oilers4ever on Mar 24, 2010 17:10:03 GMT -4
Anyone know the numbers for how many teams have come back from 3 games down to take a series? I'm on the Q site and no luck. 3 times Cape Breton in 2001 Longueuil in 1987 Drummondville in 1985 |
|
|
|
Post by mrlittlewolf on Mar 24, 2010 19:17:08 GMT -4
Looks like Moncton brought their refs tonight!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by eaglefanX on Mar 24, 2010 19:25:44 GMT -4
Taking mad advantage of the major to macausland. 2 goals in 2 minutes by Adam and MacDougall.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrlittlewolf on Mar 24, 2010 19:35:14 GMT -4
GREAT!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by lirette on Mar 24, 2010 19:39:12 GMT -4
Looks like Moncton brought their refs tonight!!! Watching the game? |
|
fan
Rookie
Posts: 225
|
Post by fan on Mar 24, 2010 19:42:20 GMT -4
If they brought their own refs they must have forgot to pay them in the first intermission
|
|
|
|
Post by Dalkiel on Mar 24, 2010 19:52:01 GMT -4
Looks like Moncton brought their refs tonight!!! Please explain which penalty(s) you disagreed with. |
|
|
|
Post by hfxfan09 on Mar 24, 2010 20:02:49 GMT -4
Go Eagles Go!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by EagleFan2009 on Mar 24, 2010 20:38:37 GMT -4
Fight to live another day.. Adam finally stepped up..
Seemed like a dirty game from the eastlink cast. Macneil going to be okay?
Pisachek match pent mean he's gone for game 5? That is going to hurt us big timeeeee.
See what happens i guess !
|
|
.And that's not just in hockey.
