zapp
Draft Pick
Posts: 87 
|
Post by zapp on May 5, 2010 11:18:17 GMT -4
Hey lala, If you're Cam and Matheson goes to BC, who do you take at #2, or do you trade down (and if you trade down, who are you trading down to select)?
|
|
Qfan69
Blue-Chip Prospect
Posts: 461
|
Post by Qfan69 on May 5, 2010 12:28:47 GMT -4
Hey lala, If you're Cam and Matheson goes to BC, who do you take at #2, or do you trade down (and if you trade down, who are you trading down to select)? If they trade down I'd like to see them get Burke or take one of the boys from Nortre Dome (Matteau, O'Brien, or Ryan). I think Bruke would fit on this team best. I think him and brent andrews would compliment each other nicely. |
|
|
|
Post by Jacques Strap on May 5, 2010 12:50:49 GMT -4
I hope they don't draft players because they are "local". That bugs the hell out of me.
|
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on May 5, 2010 13:04:46 GMT -4
Hey lala, If you're Cam and Matheson goes to BC, who do you take at #2, or do you trade down (and if you trade down, who are you trading down to select)? Trade down and take Gamelin or Hudon...thats what id do. Id take Gamelin 2nd overall but if you can trade down and pick up an asset or two and still get Gamelin or Hudon than id say thats a job well done. |
|
|
|
Post by falcon on May 5, 2010 16:17:54 GMT -4
Hey lala, If you're Cam and Matheson goes to BC, who do you take at #2, or do you trade down (and if you trade down, who are you trading down to select)? Trade down and take Gamelin or Hudon...thats what id do. Id take Gamelin 2nd overall but if you can trade down and pick up an asset or two and still get Gamelin or Hudon than id say thats a job well done. Moving down if Matheson is gone makes sense to me, would you move up to take him, what would it take, you mentioned Gelinas, that seems like alot. |
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on May 5, 2010 17:07:22 GMT -4
Trade down and take Gamelin or Hudon...thats what id do. Id take Gamelin 2nd overall but if you can trade down and pick up an asset or two and still get Gamelin or Hudon than id say thats a job well done. Moving down if Matheson is gone makes sense to me, would you move up to take him, what would it take, you mentioned Gelinas, that seems like alot. It depends on the price...ive been on the Matheson bandwagon for a while now. |
|
|
|
Post by falcon on May 5, 2010 18:07:09 GMT -4
Moving down if Matheson is gone makes sense to me, would you move up to take him, what would it take, you mentioned Gelinas, that seems like alot. It depends on the price...ive been on the Matheson bandwagon for a while now. Would you do the Gelinas and our 1st for the 1st overall, to pick Matheson? |
|
|
|
Post by howitzer on May 5, 2010 18:26:15 GMT -4
Moving down if Matheson is gone makes sense to me, would you move up to take him, what would it take, you mentioned Gelinas, that seems like alot. It depends on the price...ive been on the Matheson bandwagon for a while now. You're the driver of the "Matheson Bandwagon" lol  For me personally, as option #1, I'd like to see Matheson slide to #2 and taken by Halifax. If that doesn't happen then I'd like to see us move down, grab an extra assest and pick up whoever, Gamelin, Hudon, Burke. But if either of those 2 things don't happen, then I say grab Ciampini with the 2nd pick. From all accounts, all the kid does is score. His game isn't perfect, but if his best attribute is goal scoring, and he projects as a goal scorer then I'd be a happy Moose fan if we walked away with him at #2. And is it just me, or is June 5th taking FOREVER to get here? |
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on May 5, 2010 18:47:37 GMT -4
It depends on the price...ive been on the Matheson bandwagon for a while now. Would you do the Gelinas and our 1st for the 1st overall, to pick Matheson? Itd be tough...Gelinas is going to be a good player in this league, he already is. He will have 3 more years left at around a point per game. Maybe if it was 1st overall and 21st overall for 2nd overall and Gelinas. |
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on May 5, 2010 19:04:42 GMT -4
Not sure where else to put this but its the entire draft order courtesy of efforeur on Radoter...
1 1 BAC
1 2 HAL
1 3 CHI (Lew)
1 4 VDO
1 5 BAT
1 6 CHI
1 7 GAT
1 8 MTL
1 9 SHA
1 10 RIM
1 11 PEI
1 12 CHI (Cap)
1 13 RIM (Rou)
1 14 QUE
1 15 PEI (Vic)
1 16 BAC (Mon)
1 17 MTL (Dru)
1 18 SNB
2 19 HAL
2 20 PEI (Bac)
2 21 BAC (Lew)
2 22 CHI (VdO)
2 23 BAT
2 24 CHI
2 25 HAL (Gat)
2 26 MTL
2 27 SHA
2 28 HAL (Rim)
2 29 PEI
2 30 SHA (Cap)
2 31 BAT (Rou)
2 32 QUE
2 33 BAC (Vic)
2 34 QUE (Mon)
2 35 BAT (Dru)
2 36 LEW (Snb)
3 37 HAL
3 38 BAC
3 39 LEW
3 40 VDO
3 41 QUE (Bat)
3 42 SHA (Chi)
3 43 GAT
3 44 SNB (Mtl)
3 45 SHA
3 46 BAC (Rim)
3 47 DRU (PEI)
3 48 BAT (Cap)
3 49 MTL (Rou)
3 50 CAP (Que)
3 51 PEI (Vic)
3 52 MON
3 53 BAT (Dru)
3 54 SNB
4 55 SNB (Hal)
4 56 BAC
4 57 CHI (Lew)
4 58 SHA (VdO)
4 59 VIC (Bat)
4 60 BAT (Chi)
4 61 CAP (Gat)
4 62 MTL
4 63 CAP (Sha)
4 64 BAC (Rim)
4 65 CHI (PEI)
4 66 CAP
4 67 QUE (Rou)
4 68 DRU (Que)
4 69 PEI (Vic)
4 70 MON
4 71 DRU
4 72 MON (Snb)
5 73 BAT (Hal)
5 74 SNB (Bac)
5 75 SNB (Lew)
5 76 VDO
5 77 BAT
5 78 CHI
5 79 LEW (Gat)
5 80 CHI (Mtl)
5 81 SNB (Sha)
5 82 RIM
5 83 ROU (PEI)
5 84 ROU (Cap)
5 85 MON (Rou)
5 86 QUE
5 87 VIC
5 88 MON
5 89 DRU
5 90 BAT (Snb)
6 91 HAL
6 92 BAT (Bac)
6 93 BAT (Lew)
6 94 VDO
6 95 HAL (Bat)
6 96 CHI
6 97 ROU (Gat)
6 98 MTL
6 99 SHA
6 100 BAT (Rim)
6 101 ROU (PEI)
6 102 CAP
6 103 ROU
6 104 VIC (Que)
6 105 MON (Vic)
6 106 VIC (Mon)
6 107 DRU
6 108 ROU (Snb)
7 109 HAL
7 110 BAC
7 111 BAT (Lew)
7 112 VDO
7 113 SHA (Bat)
7 114 CHI
7 115 GAT
7 116 QUE (Mtl)
7 117 MTL (Sha)
7 118 RIM
7 119 MON (PEI)
7 120 SNB (Cap)
7 121 ROU
7 122 QUE
7 123 VIC
7 124 MON
7 125 DRU
7 126 PEI (Snb)
8 127 SNB (Hal)
8 128 SNB (Bac)
8 129 LEW
8 130 VDO
8 131 BAT
8 132 CHI
8 133 GAT
8 134 MTL
8 135 SHA
8 136 ROU (Rim)
8 137 PEI
8 138 CAP
8 139 ROU
8 140 QUE
8 141 VDO (Vic)
8 142 MON
8 143 SHA (Dru)
8 144 GAT (Snb)
9 145 HAL
9 146 BAC
9 147 LEW
9 148 VDO
9 149 BAT
9 150 CHI
9 151 SNB (Gat)
9 152 MTL
9 153 SHA
9 154 ROU (Rim)
9 155 PEI
9 156 BAC (Cap)
9 157 ROU
9 158 QUE
9 159 VIC
9 160 MON
9 161 DRU
9 162 SNB
10 163 HAL
10 164 BAC
10 165 LEW
10 166 ROU (VdO)
10 167 BAT
10 168 CHI
10 169 GAT
10 170 MTL
10 171 SHA
10 172 RIM
10 173 PEI
10 174 CHI (Cap)
10 175 ROU
10 176 QUE
10 177 BAC (Vic)
10 178 MON
10 179 DRU
10 180 SNB
11 181 HAL
11 182 BAC
11 183 LEW
11 184 VDO
11 185 BAT
11 186 CHI
11 187 GAT
11 188 MTL
11 189 SHA
11 190 RIM
11 191 PEI
11 192 CAP
11 193 ROU
11 194 QUE
11 195 VIC
11 196 MON
11 197 DRU
11 198 SNB
12 199 HAL
12 200 BAC
12 201 LEW
12 202 VDO
12 203 BAT
12 204 ROU (Chi)
12 205 GAT
12 206 MTL
12 207 SHA
12 208 RIM
12 209 PEI
12 210 CAP
12 211 HAL (Rou)
12 212 QUE
12 213 VIC
12 214 HAL (Mon)
12 215 DRU
12 216 MTL (Snb)
|
|
|
|
Post by howitzer on May 5, 2010 19:12:48 GMT -4
3 12th round picks?? That's halarious.
Cam should package those up for another 2nd rounder.
|
|
|
|
Post by sharrow on May 5, 2010 19:18:37 GMT -4
The draft is a month away and I'm glad that some posters are not making the decisions at the Moose draft table, I would definitely not see Smith trade Gelinas period, that was the last G/M we had. Any talk of trading Gelinas and our 2nd overall pick for the 1st overall is just plain foolish. You all just don't get the point that it is Skilled forwards that we are trying to acquire here NOT TRADE ONE AWAY, wake up folks your on the wrong page on this one. Don't you remember the 2007 draft when we took with our 1st pick in the second round that dman Richard Greer who could skate like Orr ( we were really in need of a goaltender and pass over Olivier Roy who broke all kinds of 'Q' records ), Greer actually played a handful of games for us over a two year period and then went to Junior 'A' in Summerside and was released during the season. FORWARDS, FORWARDS, GOALTENDER, FORWARDS this time around please !!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on May 5, 2010 19:27:53 GMT -4
Lots of teams passed over Roy...not sure why, but it wasnt only Halifax.
Also Greer wasnt Halifax's 1st pick that year...they took a very skilled forward...you want to let me know how that player turned out?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2010 19:29:28 GMT -4
Lots of teams passed over Roy...not sure why, but it wasnt only Halifax. Also Greer wasnt Halifax's 1st pick that year...they took a very skilled forward...you want to let me know how that player turned out? Sharrow meant our 1st pick in the 2nd round that year |
|
|
|
Post by lalalaprise on May 5, 2010 19:31:16 GMT -4
My bad...still irrelevant when he was picked...Greer was a bust...it doesn't have any relation to Matheson.
|
|
