|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Dec 18, 2016 11:44:57 GMT -4
Maybe somebody can sticky this, I try and keep it updated...obviously futures will impact the picks...
2018
1st(BBA)
2nd(She) 2nd(Sha)
3rd(Chi)
4th(Cha) 4th(Bat)
7th
8th(Que)8th(Bat)8th(BC)
9th 9th(Dru)
10th 10th(Cha)
11th(Rim)
13th
14th
2019
1st(Bat)
2nd 3rd 3rd(Vic)
4th
5th
6th(Cha)
7th(Cha)
8th
9th 9th(Que)9th(Rou)
10th 10th(Sha)
11th
13th
14th
2020
1st
2nd 2nd(Cha)(may be conditional on Jacques reporting)
3rd
4th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th 12th Cha
13th
14th
Updated to June 1, 2018
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Dec 21, 2016 12:29:31 GMT -4
 The 10th in 2018 from the Beaton trade seems to have disappeared but an 8th showed up, must be conditions from the Beaton trade. Hopefully Donaghey showing up bumps up the picks from Charlotteown also. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2016 12:36:26 GMT -4
Maybe somebody can sticky this, I try and keep it updated...obviously futures will impact the picks... 2017 1st 1st(RN) 2nd(BBA) 3rd(Bat) 4th(Sha) 4th(Bat) 5th 5th(Gat) 6th 8th 9th 10th 10th(Sha) 11th 12th(Dru) 13th 14th 2018 1st 2nd(Sha)2nd(Bat) 3rd 4th 4th(Cha) 5th 7th 9th 9th(Dru) 10th 10th(Que) 10th(Cha) 11th 12th 13th 14th 2019 1st 1st(Bat) 2nd 2nd(Bat)2nd(Sha) 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th A long-time fan like you can't spot the errors? That's a shame. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Dec 21, 2016 12:38:37 GMT -4
Maybe somebody can sticky this, I try and keep it updated...obviously futures will impact the picks... 2017 1st 1st(RN) 2nd(BBA) 3rd(Bat) 4th(Sha) 4th(Bat) 5th 5th(Gat) 6th 8th 9th 10th 10th(Sha) 11th 12th(Dru) 13th 14th 2018 1st 2nd(Sha)2nd(Bat) 3rd 4th 4th(Cha) 5th 7th 9th 9th(Dru) 10th 10th(Que) 10th(Cha) 11th 12th 13th 14th 2019 1st 1st(Bat) 2nd 2nd(Bat)2nd(Sha) 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th A long-time fan like you can't spot the errors? That's a shame. huh? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2016 13:08:18 GMT -4
A long-time fan like you can't spot the errors? That's a shame. huh? There's a few picks in the graph that the Wildcats don't own. |
|
|
|
Post by Edguy on Dec 21, 2016 13:09:47 GMT -4
The graphic from the second post is straight from the Wildcats. So no it wouldn't be wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Dec 21, 2016 14:40:27 GMT -4
There's a few picks in the graph that the Wildcats don't own. The Quebec 10th turned into a Quebec 8th, I assume that is due to Beaton sticking all year last yr. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Jan 5, 2017 14:40:51 GMT -4
Bump...can a mod sticky this thread??
|
|
|
|
Post by chootoi on Jan 6, 2017 12:13:18 GMT -4
|
|
|
|
Post by lisamarie on May 15, 2017 16:18:10 GMT -4
Rumor on twitter is tha Wildcat or Moosheads want trade their first pick (3-4) because the player they want will be free later in first round.
Rimouski meet Pelletier last week and want him with Lafrenière.
Moncton ask first round pick (#10) and a player.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on May 15, 2017 17:02:21 GMT -4
The Cats should stop trading back. Unless Rimouski offers something out of this world, I would pass. They need an impact player.
|
|
|
|
Post by joehockey on May 15, 2017 17:08:47 GMT -4
Rumor on twitter is tha Wildcat or Moosheads want trade their first pick (3-4) because the player they want will be free later in first round. Rimouski meet Pelletier last week and want him with Lafrenière. Moncton ask first round pick (#10) and a player. What player would Rimouski be willing to part with that Moncton would want? The player has to be a valuable piece to move all the way down to 10 (worth like a first round plus). |
|
dar
Blue-Chip Prospect
Posts: 458
|
Post by dar on May 15, 2017 17:49:18 GMT -4
If Shannon gets only gets the 10th and a player for 3rd overall, then I am really done with this team.
|
|
|
|
Post by lisamarie on May 15, 2017 18:08:09 GMT -4
Rumor on twitter is tha Wildcat or Moosheads want trade their first pick (3-4) because the player they want will be free later in first round. Rimouski meet Pelletier last week and want him with Lafrenière. Moncton ask first round pick (#10) and a player. What player would Rimouski be willing to part with that Moncton would want? The player has to be a valuable piece to move all the way down to 10 (worth like a first round plus). Idk... honnestly we don't have player who could be interesting with pick 10. For me, pick 3 will cost more than 10 and a player... But some journalist said Moncton ask a pick and a player.. |
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on May 16, 2017 17:15:17 GMT -4
If Shannon gets only gets the 10th and a player for 3rd overall, then I am really done with this team. Yup ... should be 4 big assets for a player of Pelletier's calibre. |
|
