|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 7:17:47 GMT -4
Inniss would definitely cost, but he's the best D in his age group, would still be slightly discounted under these circumstances and could return as a 20. That's arguable because Barron probably is more highly regarded. Did Innis even get picked in the NHL draft last year? (I don't know if he did or didnt) There are a few decent ones though with Ortiz and Guenette in the mix although at Val's point in the cycle, Guenette is pretty much sticking there. Pelletier is a solid option too. 2001 was a good year for D. Sorry, I forgot Barron. Inniss is arguably above the other two, but a different type of D. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 7:35:08 GMT -4
Trading Nic is a bummer, no matter what, but I still hope we buy some players that help the build up concept.
Unfortunately, the same logic has to be applied if teams come calling for Deakin-Poot, Bouthillier, or Cajkovic too, that if the deals get us where we are going and we can bring in a little version for this year (or an immediate return), we have to consider it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Y Ddraig Goch on Dec 15, 2019 7:37:14 GMT -4
Trading Nic is a bummer, no matter what, but I still hope we buy some players that help the build up concept. Unfortunately, the same logic has to be applied if teams come calling for Deakin-Poot, Bouthillier, or Cajkovic too, that if the deals get us where we are going and we can bring in a little version for this year (or an immediate return), we have to consider it. Cajkovic is back next year though isn't he? So worth keeping? unless it's get the assets Plus the new Euro? Interesting situation with him regarding where that pick might end up. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 7:39:07 GMT -4
Trading Nic is a bummer, no matter what, but I still hope we buy some players that help the build up concept. Unfortunately, the same logic has to be applied if teams come calling for Deakin-Poot, Bouthillier, or Cajkovic too, that if the deals get us where we are going and we can bring in a little version for this year (or an immediate return), we have to consider it. Cajkovic is back next year though isn't he? So worth keeping? unless it's get the assets Plus the new Euro? Interesting situation with him regarding where that pick might end up. Cajkovic is only available if a team overpays (he fits Sherbrooke's two-year run perfectly). If not, he stays and we have a crappy situation. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 7:47:37 GMT -4
With Mcquaid off the board (Charlottetown), Alex DeGagne from Victoriaville could be another possible stabilizing D.
|
|
|
|
Post by joehockey on Dec 15, 2019 9:10:19 GMT -4
Inniss would definitely cost, but he's the best D in his age group, would still be slightly discounted under these circumstances and could return as a 20. That's arguable because Barron probably is more highly regarded. Did Innis even get picked in the NHL draft last year? (I don't know if he did or didnt) There are a few decent ones though with Ortiz and Guenette in the mix although at Val's point in the cycle, Guenette is pretty much sticking there. Pelletier is a solid option too. 2001 was a good year for D. Spence too. To say Innis is the best D in his age group is a stretch |
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Dec 15, 2019 13:00:01 GMT -4
Cajkovic is back next year though isn't he? So worth keeping? unless it's get the assets Plus the new Euro? Interesting situation with him regarding where that pick might end up. Cajkovic is only available if a team overpays (he fits Sherbrooke's two-year run perfectly). If not, he stays and we have a crappy situation. What's the crappy situation if he stays? |
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Dec 15, 2019 13:02:19 GMT -4
Did anyone see what Flower did to get his game misconduct? The box score does not look good for him. No idea but would be very interested to find out. I can't think who it might have been directed towards. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 13:02:27 GMT -4
Cajkovic is only available if a team overpays (he fits Sherbrooke's two-year run perfectly). If not, he stays and we have a crappy situation. What's the crappy situation if he stays? 1st overall Euro, 6th overall Euro, high Euro pick |
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Dec 15, 2019 13:05:25 GMT -4
What's the crappy situation if he stays? 1st overall Euro, 6th overall Euro, high Euro pick I don't think the pick will be all that high. If we do have someone lined up, room can likely be made for him without losing Cajkovic. |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 13:08:31 GMT -4
1st overall Euro, 6th overall Euro, high Euro pick I don't think the pick will be all that high. If we do have someone lined up, room can likely be made for him without losing Cajkovic. To make the pick, one of Cajkovic or Lehmus has to leave |
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Dec 15, 2019 13:18:03 GMT -4
I don't think the pick will be all that high. If we do have someone lined up, room can likely be made for him without losing Cajkovic. To make the pick, one of Cajkovic or Lehmus has to leave I realize that. Connect the dots..... |
|
|
|
Post by j3e4 on Dec 15, 2019 13:31:08 GMT -4
I'm in no rush to get rid of either but I think the choice would be obvious if it came down to it. My guess is we end up passing on the pick. Could always trade one at the draft too.
|
|
|
|
Post by yoyomamajoe on Dec 15, 2019 14:24:23 GMT -4
My guess durocher and our 2nd back I would literally swear at them for an offer like that What if it is Durocher and a second, with the second going back at the draft for Inniss or Massicotte? Or should there be more to it? |
|
|
|
Post by Briwhel on Dec 15, 2019 14:29:36 GMT -4
I would literally swear at them for an offer like that What if it is Durocher and a second, with the second going back at the draft for Inniss or Massicotte? Or should there be more to it? That's fine. There has to be a why for us |
|
