|
|
Post by sakss on Sept 4, 2007 7:06:59 GMT -4
In The T&T this morning , flynn says they are now down to 8 defenceman.
i think we might have our answer if there was a possibility of him coming back.
|
|
|
|
Post by sharrow on Sept 4, 2007 7:26:03 GMT -4
It could be simply the fact that the deals given Brown and Macausland are becoming common knowledge and the damage they cause in the dressing room is having an effect. by the way the Brown situation is looking more and more like the Mike Fournier situation however Irving will not get out of this as easy.
|
|
|
|
Post by crashthenet on Sept 4, 2007 7:34:36 GMT -4
Can you elaborate on the Fournier situation. I am not sure what that is about.
What is the problem with Brown. His education package or his readiness for the Q?
|
|
|
|
Post by 2wild on Sept 4, 2007 7:45:05 GMT -4
Mike Fournier Wow!He s american while Brown is Canadian(and a forward)..........what s your point?
|
|
|
|
Post by buckybuckbuck on Sept 4, 2007 8:58:34 GMT -4
Flynn says that are down to 8 but there is 9 defensemen on the site. Who is cut? Are they saying Dimitruk is definitely out?
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Obvious on Sept 4, 2007 9:18:37 GMT -4
The best thing they can do is give the Dimitruk clan some time...even if he comes back at Christmas he gets a half year under his belt and should be a key player at 18 and 19.
|
|
|
|
Post by HockeyAngel17 on Sept 4, 2007 10:15:41 GMT -4
ok so this is what i got.. theres not much of an explanation but on Facebook this is what he told one of the boys.. i copied and pasted his quote "<quote removed.>"
edit: Facebook profiles for the most part are private. posting this information here is IMO violating his privacy since we all do not have access to the Facebook profile this was posted in.
|
|
|
|
Post by chsb on Sept 4, 2007 11:34:15 GMT -4
Quote: "edit: Facebook profiles for the most part are private. posting this information here is IMO violating his privacy since we all do not have access to the Facebook profile this was posted in." Sensitive subject?? Another case of Monctonian not wanting to lose face   |
|
|
|
Post by sakss on Sept 4, 2007 11:47:22 GMT -4
Can you guys post about the reason without putting the actual quote? We still dont know what its all about.
And i dont think we need to PM each other to know what is going on ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Wayne on Sept 4, 2007 12:03:48 GMT -4
Quote: "edit: Facebook profiles for the most part are private. posting this information here is IMO violating his privacy since we all do not have access to the Facebook profile this was posted in." Sensitive subject?? Another case of Monctonian not wanting to lose face Nope. I just know how the privacy of Facebook profiles work. Things posted into these profiles are not generally open to the public. I've already told hockeyangel17 that if she can show me that this was public information (ie: an open Facebook profile that she got this info) then I will rescind my edit. Plus, this news will probably be in either the T&T or AN shortly. |
|
|
|
Post by buckybuckbuck on Sept 4, 2007 13:38:04 GMT -4
Private subjects are posted here all the time. If hockeyAngle was to post that Dimitruk said .... and that is what he is saying on his facebook, then that isn't private at all. He put it openly on Facebook, he has her as a friend, and she is sharing with others. There would be no case there what so ever. We have inside information appearing here all the time that way. The only thing that would be out of place is that she posted the exact link to facebook.
We get things from billets, from friends of hockeyplayers, staff... all kinds of sources but no one ever stopped it before. If he allowed her as a friend and shared it with her and she reports it then you have no place editing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Wayne on Sept 4, 2007 13:42:40 GMT -4
We get things from billets, from friends of hockeyplayers, staff... all kinds of sources but no one ever stopped it before. If he allowed her as a friend and shared it with her and she reports it then you have no place editing it. The way it was worded it was not posted to her profile - it was said "this is what he told one of the boys...". In any event, like I've posted, if she can show it was an open profile it was posted to, I'll rescind my edit. |
|
|
|
Post by Dalkiel on Sept 4, 2007 14:12:09 GMT -4
We get things from billets, from friends of hockeyplayers, staff... all kinds of sources but no one ever stopped it before. If he allowed her as a friend and shared it with her and she reports it then you have no place editing it. The way it was worded it was not posted to her profile - it was said "this is what he told one of the boys...". In any event, like I've posted, if she can show it was an open profile it was posted to, I'll rescind my edit. Could she comback and re-word it "I heard that his reason was......" ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Wayne on Sept 4, 2007 14:28:48 GMT -4
The way it was worded it was not posted to her profile - it was said "this is what he told one of the boys...". In any event, like I've posted, if she can show it was an open profile it was posted to, I'll rescind my edit. Could she comback and re-word it "I heard that his reason was......" ;D ;D ;D That would be preferred. |
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Sept 4, 2007 14:40:08 GMT -4
Could she comback and re-word it "I heard that his reason was......" ;D ;D ;D That would be preferred. And what did you hear (or read) was the reason ? Please paraphrase and don't quote anything directly. |
|
