|
Rumours
Dec 3, 2007 17:59:57 GMT -4
Post by killer on Dec 3, 2007 17:59:57 GMT -4
one of our extra forwards and our 2nd might get it done. We'd have to pay less than Quebec. It would cost alot more then that............. sounds like a one sided Fog devil offer.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 3, 2007 19:29:18 GMT -4
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 3, 2007 19:29:18 GMT -4
one of our extra forwards and our 2nd might get it done. We'd have to pay less than Quebec. Not going to happen. VDO will just sit on Louis unless someone offers something outrageous.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 3, 2007 19:30:12 GMT -4
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 3, 2007 19:30:12 GMT -4
The Fullerton to Halifax rumour doesnt make much sense...
Halifax has POP so basically the deal would have to be Fullerton for POP + something...
Halifax isnt going to straight up and deal for Fullerton and release POP...and I cant see Halifax offering anything substantial because it isnt a big enough upgrade...
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 3, 2007 22:22:18 GMT -4
Post by markofthebeast on Dec 3, 2007 22:22:18 GMT -4
one of our extra forwards and our 2nd might get it done. We'd have to pay less than Quebec. It would cost alot more then that............. sounds like a one sided Fog devil offer. Depends on how sure VDO are that he won't play if they are confident he wont it might be considered a steal to get anything for a player not willing to play in the CHL (I don't think this is the case he's just holing out for a better package by the looks of it.) So yes that wouldn't be enough. Also as far as I know it's against league policy (take that for what it’s worth) to talk to another teams player about playing for your team. Therefore the potential team would have no clue weather or not he would play for them or what he wants to play thus making any trade for a high pick or player even if he is a 3rd liner too expensive/risky. It's a catch 22 for any other team then Quebec.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 3, 2007 22:25:12 GMT -4
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 3, 2007 22:25:12 GMT -4
It would cost alot more then that............. sounds like a one sided Fog devil offer. Depends on how sure VDO are that he won't play if they are confident he wont it might be considered a steal to get anything for a player not willing to play in the CHL (I don't think this is the case he's just holing out for a better package by the looks of it.) So yes that wouldn't be enough. Also as far as I know it's against league policy (take that for what it’s worth) to talk to another teams player about playing for your team. Therefore the potential team would have no clue weather or not he would play for them or what he wants to play thus making any trade for a high pick or player even if he is a 3rd liner too expensive/risky. It's a catch 22 for any other team then Quebec. Theyd rather he rot...than go to another team in the league and rip it up.... They want a lot for him...if not...oh well...he wont play in the league.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 3, 2007 22:27:51 GMT -4
Post by markofthebeast on Dec 3, 2007 22:27:51 GMT -4
Yeah exactly and another team won't offer a lot unless they know exactly what he wants and are assured he will 100% play. The only team that really know that is Quebec so we're back at square one. I say he rots.
|
|
|
Post by bjindaho on Dec 4, 2007 3:00:11 GMT -4
which is why a team from the other conference might work. We just may have to add more. And a Charland + 2nd offer is not that one-sided given that LeBlanc may not want to play for us.
|
|
|
Post by dogbert on Dec 4, 2007 9:54:14 GMT -4
i hope jb has a conversation regarding louis leblanc A very intriguing idea. One thing I've learned about JB is that if something does happen, it will be a surprise.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 10:34:34 GMT -4
Post by mrlittlewolf on Dec 4, 2007 10:34:34 GMT -4
thank god for that after last years goalie fiasco im glad JB has all leaks sealed
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 10:43:02 GMT -4
Post by chillywack on Dec 4, 2007 10:43:02 GMT -4
thank god for that after last years goalie fiasco im glad JB has all leaks sealed But aren't you glad we never got Smith? Look what he did with Les Remparts .... shit all. And that was with a strong team in front of him. One could only imagine with the Sea Dogs roster in front of him last year.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 10:45:10 GMT -4
Post by canucklehead on Dec 4, 2007 10:45:10 GMT -4
thank god for that after last years goalie fiasco im glad JB has all leaks sealed But aren't you glad we never got Smith? Look what he did with Les Remparts .... shit all. And that was with a strong team in front of him. One could only imagine with the Sea Dogs roster in front of him last year. My guess is they only did it to screw another team anyway mainly Saint John
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 12:50:23 GMT -4
Post by mrlittlewolf on Dec 4, 2007 12:50:23 GMT -4
yes im glad but too much info was leaking out of HS last year. I prefer it this way. Nice to know things ahead of time but when loose lips get stories all hell breaks loose
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 14:57:21 GMT -4
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 4, 2007 14:57:21 GMT -4
which is why a team from the other conference might work. We just may have to add more. And a Charland + 2nd offer is not that one-sided given that LeBlanc may not want to play for us. Would you deal Despres for Charland and a 2nd? VDO drafted Leblanc with the intention of him sitting out for a bit...it was a risk on their part...they will either trade him for a lot or nothing at all. Yeah sure he was picked 18th overall..but hes a top 3 player from that draft and they want top 3 return...
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 15:18:58 GMT -4
Post by dogbert on Dec 4, 2007 15:18:58 GMT -4
which is why a team from the other conference might work. We just may have to add more. And a Charland + 2nd offer is not that one-sided given that LeBlanc may not want to play for us. Would you deal Despres for Charland and a 2nd? VDO drafted Leblanc with the intention of him sitting out for a bit...it was a risk on their part...they will either trade him for a lot or nothing at all. Yeah sure he was picked 18th overall..but hes a top 3 player from that draft and they want top 3 return... If Despres had yet to report and there was no hope of getting him to, ya, sure.
|
|
|
Rumours
Dec 4, 2007 15:26:42 GMT -4
Post by lalalaprise on Dec 4, 2007 15:26:42 GMT -4
Would you deal Despres for Charland and a 2nd? VDO drafted Leblanc with the intention of him sitting out for a bit...it was a risk on their part...they will either trade him for a lot or nothing at all. Yeah sure he was picked 18th overall..but hes a top 3 player from that draft and they want top 3 return... If Despres had yet to report and there was no hope of getting him to, ya, sure. VDO knew what they were getting into...thats the difference....they arent going to "cut their losses" with the kid at xmas because they drafted knowing it might be a long term venture. They would laugh in your face if you offered that for Leblanc...
|
|